<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the show and the false charge of the declining libido</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jane Langdon</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10073</guid>
		<description>â€œCat Fightâ€  Now Playing

I recently sent a Press Release to Amy Alkon who writes a 
syndicated column called "Advice Goddess" and got a 
diatribe about our company on her website. The statements are false.

Here are some of her nasty comments. For complete text see 
AdviceGoddess.com.
So I have published an amusing Blog about her at 
www.sew-beautiful.us/concreep

Amy...The following statements you made about me and our 
company, Sew Beautiful, www.sew-beautiful.us on 
your Blog are libelous and they are false. You have no basis 
for making these remarks. Here are Amyâ€™s remarks...

"I especially love your argument that your customers like it. 
I'm sure the guy who gets a stolen TV really cheaply from a 
fence is thrilled as well.

"DOES Chanel really know what you're doing? I doubt it."
"I'm loath to believe anything you say"

"...there's much you're doing that's illegal"
"Your rationalization of it is absolutely disgusting"
"Clearly, you are utterly unconcerned with much but 
making a profit."

"Your business practices make me retch, and your 
disrespect for others' creative work and intellectual property 
is creepy."

"Hey, there were lots of Nazis in WWII. Doesn't make it right to murder Jews, homosexuals, and gypsies. 
"Everybody's doing it" doesn't make it moral. What's so 
disturbing is the energy you put into defending your taking 
the work of others and profiting from it. All of the above 
knockoff artists sicken me. It's wrong to profit from work 
that is not yours -- whether or not there's some hole in the 
fence of the law that permits you to sneak through and do it."


Amy 
I am sorry we have had such a negative 
correspondence about my site. I am really a good person 
who wanted to help people who had trouble taking their 
medications. My sister-in-law has Parkinson's. It all started 
with our PILL PROOF kit and just expanded from there. I 
was in a bad car accident and was unable to work for 10 
years from a back injury. My doctor said I should start an 
internet business so I would be able to work around my 
injury. I never thought I would have so many businesses. I 
am truly blessed and mean no bad will towards you.
  
Jane Langdon

www.sew-beautiful.us/concreep

www.sew-beautiful.us/yournetstores


Complete Text                                                                                                                          
http://www.advicegoddess.com/goddessblog.html 
http://www.advicegoddess.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=1376


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œCat Fightâ€  Now Playing</p>
<p>I recently sent a Press Release to Amy Alkon who writes a<br />
syndicated column called &#8220;Advice Goddess&#8221; and got a<br />
diatribe about our company on her website. The statements are false.</p>
<p>Here are some of her nasty comments. For complete text see<br />
AdviceGoddess.com.<br />
So I have published an amusing Blog about her at<br />
<a href="http://www.sew-beautiful.us/concreep" rel="nofollow">http://www.sew-beautiful.us/concreep</a></p>
<p>Amy&#8230;The following statements you made about me and our<br />
company, Sew Beautiful, <a href="http://www.sew-beautiful.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.sew-beautiful.us</a> on<br />
your Blog are libelous and they are false. You have no basis<br />
for making these remarks. Here are Amyâ€™s remarks&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I especially love your argument that your customers like it.<br />
I&#8217;m sure the guy who gets a stolen TV really cheaply from a<br />
fence is thrilled as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;DOES Chanel really know what you&#8217;re doing? I doubt it.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m loath to believe anything you say&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;there&#8217;s much you&#8217;re doing that&#8217;s illegal&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Your rationalization of it is absolutely disgusting&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Clearly, you are utterly unconcerned with much but<br />
making a profit.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Your business practices make me retch, and your<br />
disrespect for others&#8217; creative work and intellectual property<br />
is creepy.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, there were lots of Nazis in WWII. Doesn&#8217;t make it right to murder Jews, homosexuals, and gypsies.<br />
&#8220;Everybody&#8217;s doing it&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make it moral. What&#8217;s so<br />
disturbing is the energy you put into defending your taking<br />
the work of others and profiting from it. All of the above<br />
knockoff artists sicken me. It&#8217;s wrong to profit from work<br />
that is not yours &#8212; whether or not there&#8217;s some hole in the<br />
fence of the law that permits you to sneak through and do it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amy<br />
I am sorry we have had such a negative<br />
correspondence about my site. I am really a good person<br />
who wanted to help people who had trouble taking their<br />
medications. My sister-in-law has Parkinson&#8217;s. It all started<br />
with our PILL PROOF kit and just expanded from there. I<br />
was in a bad car accident and was unable to work for 10<br />
years from a back injury. My doctor said I should start an<br />
internet business so I would be able to work around my<br />
injury. I never thought I would have so many businesses. I<br />
am truly blessed and mean no bad will towards you.</p>
<p>Jane Langdon</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sew-beautiful.us/concreep" rel="nofollow">http://www.sew-beautiful.us/concreep</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sew-beautiful.us/yournetstores" rel="nofollow">http://www.sew-beautiful.us/yournetstores</a></p>
<p>Complete Text<br />
<a href="http://www.advicegoddess.com/goddessblog.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.advicegoddess.com/goddessblog.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.advicegoddess.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=1376" rel="nofollow">http://www.advicegoddess.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=1376</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Langdon</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10072</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10072</guid>
		<description>I recently sent a Press Release to Amy Alkon who writes a 
syndicated column called "Advice Goddess" and got a 
diatribe about our company on her website.

Here are some of her nasty comments. For complete text 
see AdviceGoddess.com at 
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2005/03/a_fittin
g_busin_1.html

The following statements you made about me and our 
company, Sew Beautiful, (www.sew-beautiful.us) on 
your Blog are libelous and they are false. You have no 
basis for making these remarks.

Amy wrote..

"I especially love your argument that your customers like 
it. I'm sure the guy who gets a stolen TV really cheaply 
from a fence is thrilled as well.

"DOES Chanel really know what you're doing? I doubt it."
"I'm loath to believe anything you say"

"...there's much you're doing that's illegal"
"Your rationalization of it is absolutely disgusting"
"Clearly, you are utterly unconcerned with much but 
making a profit."

"Your business practices make me retch, and your 
disrespect for others' creative work and intellectual 
property is creepy."

"Hey, there were lots of Nazis in WWII. Doesn't make it 
right to murder Jews, homosexuals, and gypsies. 
"Everybody's doing it" doesn't make it moral. What's so 
disturbing is the energy you put into defending your 
taking the work of others and profiting from it. All of the 
above knockoff artists sicken me. It's wrong to profit from 
work that is not yours -- whether or not there's some hole 
in the fence of the law that permits you to sneak through 
and do it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently sent a Press Release to Amy Alkon who writes a<br />
syndicated column called &#8220;Advice Goddess&#8221; and got a<br />
diatribe about our company on her website.</p>
<p>Here are some of her nasty comments. For complete text<br />
see AdviceGoddess.com at<br />
<a href="http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2005/03/a_fittin" rel="nofollow">http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2005/03/a_fittin</a><br />
g_busin_1.html</p>
<p>The following statements you made about me and our<br />
company, Sew Beautiful, (www.sew-beautiful.us) on<br />
your Blog are libelous and they are false. You have no<br />
basis for making these remarks.</p>
<p>Amy wrote..</p>
<p>&#8220;I especially love your argument that your customers like<br />
it. I&#8217;m sure the guy who gets a stolen TV really cheaply<br />
from a fence is thrilled as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;DOES Chanel really know what you&#8217;re doing? I doubt it.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m loath to believe anything you say&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;there&#8217;s much you&#8217;re doing that&#8217;s illegal&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Your rationalization of it is absolutely disgusting&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Clearly, you are utterly unconcerned with much but<br />
making a profit.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Your business practices make me retch, and your<br />
disrespect for others&#8217; creative work and intellectual<br />
property is creepy.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, there were lots of Nazis in WWII. Doesn&#8217;t make it<br />
right to murder Jews, homosexuals, and gypsies.<br />
&#8220;Everybody&#8217;s doing it&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make it moral. What&#8217;s so<br />
disturbing is the energy you put into defending your<br />
taking the work of others and profiting from it. All of the<br />
above knockoff artists sicken me. It&#8217;s wrong to profit from<br />
work that is not yours &#8212; whether or not there&#8217;s some hole<br />
in the fence of the law that permits you to sneak through<br />
and do it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10071</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10071</guid>
		<description>For those considering having casual sex because it is seen as "down with patriarchal sexual conservatism" and the done thing in your general environs, let me just say that on reading Emily and bmmg's statements about being virgins, I felt a strong twinge of regret for my sexual behavior in high school and college.  I have been married for three years now, and it is only in the context of working to shift my concept of hot sex from "drunken hook-up with one of the guys in the band" to "being with someone you love but also know about their bathroom habits" (no small picnic, that), that I am beginning to understand how damaging my earlier behavior was to my own sense of self and empowerment and sexual identity.  It's like the virgin-whore dichotomy was inside my own head!  Hard to get as frisky on your honeymoon when the idea of married sex makes you think of 50s couples in separate beds. I'm having to work really hard on integrating the sober, married part of me with the sexual part of me and although I am getting there, through the use of all sorts of stereotypical things, like lingerie and baths and little games, I wouldn't wish this process on anyone else. 

The whole getting drunk to lose my inhibitions thing wasn't great for my self-esteem either and almost developed into a serious alcohol problem until I got it under control.  So although I thought when I was younger how "lame" I would be if I didn't treat sex like a casual fun thing with no strings attached (I used to tell people it was like tennis, a fun way to spend a couple hours and get your endorphin levels up), I really wish I hadn't been afraid to at least try being "lame" for a little while.  Who knows, I might have liked it and avoided some future problems to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those considering having casual sex because it is seen as &#8220;down with patriarchal sexual conservatism&#8221; and the done thing in your general environs, let me just say that on reading Emily and bmmg&#8217;s statements about being virgins, I felt a strong twinge of regret for my sexual behavior in high school and college.  I have been married for three years now, and it is only in the context of working to shift my concept of hot sex from &#8220;drunken hook-up with one of the guys in the band&#8221; to &#8220;being with someone you love but also know about their bathroom habits&#8221; (no small picnic, that), that I am beginning to understand how damaging my earlier behavior was to my own sense of self and empowerment and sexual identity.  It&#8217;s like the virgin-whore dichotomy was inside my own head!  Hard to get as frisky on your honeymoon when the idea of married sex makes you think of 50s couples in separate beds. I&#8217;m having to work really hard on integrating the sober, married part of me with the sexual part of me and although I am getting there, through the use of all sorts of stereotypical things, like lingerie and baths and little games, I wouldn&#8217;t wish this process on anyone else. </p>
<p>The whole getting drunk to lose my inhibitions thing wasn&#8217;t great for my self-esteem either and almost developed into a serious alcohol problem until I got it under control.  So although I thought when I was younger how &#8220;lame&#8221; I would be if I didn&#8217;t treat sex like a casual fun thing with no strings attached (I used to tell people it was like tennis, a fun way to spend a couple hours and get your endorphin levels up), I really wish I hadn&#8217;t been afraid to at least try being &#8220;lame&#8221; for a little while.  Who knows, I might have liked it and avoided some future problems to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10070</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10070</guid>
		<description>Hugo, you yourself said (in response to a comment I made about how MRA types seem bewilderingly homophobic) that, on your first appearance on his show, Glenn had made a snide  comment about gay men in response to something you'd said.

&lt;i&gt;the general consensus that sexual conservatism was something invented in order to keep women down, and you're buying into the patriarchy if you agree with it&lt;/i&gt;

There have always been men who pushed this argument, by the way. "You're not uptight, babe, are you?" was around in the 1960s. Regardless, it's not the behavior, but the reason. Being a virgin because you choose to be and are happy with it is far different than being a virgin because sex is something men do to women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo, you yourself said (in response to a comment I made about how MRA types seem bewilderingly homophobic) that, on your first appearance on his show, Glenn had made a snide  comment about gay men in response to something you&#8217;d said.</p>
<p><i>the general consensus that sexual conservatism was something invented in order to keep women down, and you&#8217;re buying into the patriarchy if you agree with it</i></p>
<p>There have always been men who pushed this argument, by the way. &#8220;You&#8217;re not uptight, babe, are you?&#8221; was around in the 1960s. Regardless, it&#8217;s not the behavior, but the reason. Being a virgin because you choose to be and are happy with it is far different than being a virgin because sex is something men do to women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10069</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10069</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I believe, from experience, that parenting is by far the most rewarding work a human can do. I believe that missing the opportunity to do this job, whether one is male or female, is a tragedy.&lt;/i&gt;

See now, having a child for me would be a tragedy, a way to have all the possibilites laid out before me snuffed out of existence.  But I certainly think other people enjoy having children.  Why do we have to characterize other people's choices as "tragedies" and imply that conforming is the only route to happiness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I believe, from experience, that parenting is by far the most rewarding work a human can do. I believe that missing the opportunity to do this job, whether one is male or female, is a tragedy.</i></p>
<p>See now, having a child for me would be a tragedy, a way to have all the possibilites laid out before me snuffed out of existence.  But I certainly think other people enjoy having children.  Why do we have to characterize other people&#8217;s choices as &#8220;tragedies&#8221; and imply that conforming is the only route to happiness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmmg39</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10068</link>
		<dc:creator>bmmg39</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10068</guid>
		<description>"-Please don't judge me for having casual sex when all I said was that it was hard to navigate the current culture, sexually. As it happens, I'm a 22-year-old virgin. But does anyone really want to say that on the internet!?"

Maybe, especially since I'm a THIRTY-two year old virgin (and a dude)...so it's not as unusual as you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;-Please don&#8217;t judge me for having casual sex when all I said was that it was hard to navigate the current culture, sexually. As it happens, I&#8217;m a 22-year-old virgin. But does anyone really want to say that on the internet!?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe, especially since I&#8217;m a THIRTY-two year old virgin (and a dude)&#8230;so it&#8217;s not as unusual as you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yami</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10067</link>
		<dc:creator>yami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10067</guid>
		<description>I'm not *that* far out of college, but I went to male-dominated nerd school so the dating scene was... different. Anyway, I didn't mean to imply that in-betweeners can't meet people, merely that they're in a dating scene where  one's other opinions predominate, so it's harder to pre-screen on that particular criterion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not *that* far out of college, but I went to male-dominated nerd school so the dating scene was&#8230; different. Anyway, I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that in-betweeners can&#8217;t meet people, merely that they&#8217;re in a dating scene where  one&#8217;s other opinions predominate, so it&#8217;s harder to pre-screen on that particular criterion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10066</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10066</guid>
		<description>Um.

I am hideously bad at engaging in debate. Particularly when sick, tired, overworked. I apologize. I should know better than to start things and not respond.

-Please don't judge me for having casual sex when all I said was that it was hard to navigate the current culture, sexually. As it happens, I'm a 22-year-old virgin. But does anyone really want to say that on the internet!?

-I do think that the situation is probably not as bad, for most people, as I made it out to be. I agree with yami's comment that being in an in-between place rules out bars and very evangelical student groups, but you can still meet people through hobbies, in class, etc. It's frustrating that my social environments are (a) 90% female classes, and (b) interests/hobbies that trend VERY liberal sexually, but I am an exception and not a rule.

-In some ways I feel that the pressure to have sex isn't from guys, but from the general consensus that sexual conservatism was something invented in order to keep women down, and you're buying into the patriarchy if you agree with it. There are days when I suspect it's true. This is why I like Hugo's blog so much--it offers evidence that a pro-feminist position and a relatively conservative position on sexuality are compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um.</p>
<p>I am hideously bad at engaging in debate. Particularly when sick, tired, overworked. I apologize. I should know better than to start things and not respond.</p>
<p>-Please don&#8217;t judge me for having casual sex when all I said was that it was hard to navigate the current culture, sexually. As it happens, I&#8217;m a 22-year-old virgin. But does anyone really want to say that on the internet!?</p>
<p>-I do think that the situation is probably not as bad, for most people, as I made it out to be. I agree with yami&#8217;s comment that being in an in-between place rules out bars and very evangelical student groups, but you can still meet people through hobbies, in class, etc. It&#8217;s frustrating that my social environments are (a) 90% female classes, and (b) interests/hobbies that trend VERY liberal sexually, but I am an exception and not a rule.</p>
<p>-In some ways I feel that the pressure to have sex isn&#8217;t from guys, but from the general consensus that sexual conservatism was something invented in order to keep women down, and you&#8217;re buying into the patriarchy if you agree with it. There are days when I suspect it&#8217;s true. This is why I like Hugo&#8217;s blog so much&#8211;it offers evidence that a pro-feminist position and a relatively conservative position on sexuality are compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keri</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10065</link>
		<dc:creator>Keri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10065</guid>
		<description>yami: Right, but that also means that most of the people looking to meet partners in neutral territory (classes, clubs, etc.) are going to be "in-betweens," since the fratboys and evangelicals will probably stick to the places where they're less likely to have compatibility issues with any given potential partner. And since many of the in-betweens probably don't have strong feelings about the casual sex issue either way, it's not going to be that hard for any given in-betweener to find, if not someone who shares their identical values, at least someone who's willing to compromise to a point where both partners are satisfied. (Besides, I'm still convinced that most people find dates through their extended group of friends rather than among groups of random strangers, which makes it even more likely that one will find a compatible partner, because one tends to select friends with generally similar worldviews.)

I'm in college now, and though my perspective may not be as informed as some other college students' might be because I don't live in the dorms, I've really never noticed conflicting values about sexuality being a particularly big issue in any of my friends' relationships. In fact, it almost seems as if there's a mostly unspoken agreement among most of the people I know to forgo, if not all sexual activity, at least intercourse; they're very aware of the threat of unwanted pregnancy and are doing all they can to avoid it. And we're hardly conservative Christians, so yeah, there's hope for those who find the extreme options unpalatable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yami: Right, but that also means that most of the people looking to meet partners in neutral territory (classes, clubs, etc.) are going to be &#8220;in-betweens,&#8221; since the fratboys and evangelicals will probably stick to the places where they&#8217;re less likely to have compatibility issues with any given potential partner. And since many of the in-betweens probably don&#8217;t have strong feelings about the casual sex issue either way, it&#8217;s not going to be that hard for any given in-betweener to find, if not someone who shares their identical values, at least someone who&#8217;s willing to compromise to a point where both partners are satisfied. (Besides, I&#8217;m still convinced that most people find dates through their extended group of friends rather than among groups of random strangers, which makes it even more likely that one will find a compatible partner, because one tends to select friends with generally similar worldviews.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in college now, and though my perspective may not be as informed as some other college students&#8217; might be because I don&#8217;t live in the dorms, I&#8217;ve really never noticed conflicting values about sexuality being a particularly big issue in any of my friends&#8217; relationships. In fact, it almost seems as if there&#8217;s a mostly unspoken agreement among most of the people I know to forgo, if not all sexual activity, at least intercourse; they&#8217;re very aware of the threat of unwanted pregnancy and are doing all they can to avoid it. And we&#8217;re hardly conservative Christians, so yeah, there&#8217;s hope for those who find the extreme options unpalatable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10064</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/03/21/thoughts-on-the-show-and-the-false-charge-of-the-declining-libido/#comment-10064</guid>
		<description>Mythago, just out of curiosity, when did Glenn make a fag joke?  I have never heard that from him...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mythago, just out of curiosity, when did Glenn make a fag joke?  I have never heard that from him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
