<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more silent &#8220;good guys&#8221;: some thoughts about North Country</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kage</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17140</link>
		<dc:creator>Kage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17140</guid>
		<description>Jaketk,  What's your point? That men are also victimised by men, so women shouldn't complain? That because men accept hazing, so should women? Nothing you've said justifies standing around watching other people be victimised.

Please enlighten me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaketk,  What&#8217;s your point? That men are also victimised by men, so women shouldn&#8217;t complain? That because men accept hazing, so should women? Nothing you&#8217;ve said justifies standing around watching other people be victimised.</p>
<p>Please enlighten me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Lou Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17139</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Lou Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 10:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17139</guid>
		<description>I work for the Dept of Corrections in a chemical dependence/domestic violence program.This program is the only one in the country that deals with both issues.When identifying them selfs they have to state they are addicts and batterers, most of the men are very uncomfortable stating this in the beginning because they believe if they have not hit thier partners (this is what they must call the women they are involved with)they have not committed domestic violence.We educate the men,but they are told they can only change if they CHOOSE to.The only way to do this is to just STOP. If you have any kind of material we can use in educateing these men and stopping DV please let me know how to get new material of any kind Thank you in advance.Betty Lou Jacobs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for the Dept of Corrections in a chemical dependence/domestic violence program.This program is the only one in the country that deals with both issues.When identifying them selfs they have to state they are addicts and batterers, most of the men are very uncomfortable stating this in the beginning because they believe if they have not hit thier partners (this is what they must call the women they are involved with)they have not committed domestic violence.We educate the men,but they are told they can only change if they CHOOSE to.The only way to do this is to just STOP. If you have any kind of material we can use in educateing these men and stopping DV please let me know how to get new material of any kind Thank you in advance.Betty Lou Jacobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaketk</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17138</link>
		<dc:creator>jaketk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17138</guid>
		<description>you are entitled to your opinion, but i think you are dismissing a ton of violence done against males in the name of "belonging to the group." male hazing can be quite violent, and often times males will tolerate far more than women will because of social stigmas and the overall desire to belong to the group. it is unfortunate that you do not think males can be subject to such violence, or worse. i could give you examples it, but somehow i doubt that would make much of a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are entitled to your opinion, but i think you are dismissing a ton of violence done against males in the name of &#8220;belonging to the group.&#8221; male hazing can be quite violent, and often times males will tolerate far more than women will because of social stigmas and the overall desire to belong to the group. it is unfortunate that you do not think males can be subject to such violence, or worse. i could give you examples it, but somehow i doubt that would make much of a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheelzebub</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17137</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17137</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;with guys, there is this other unspoken rule that if someone complains about the things you had to endure, and as a result gets out of it, they're out of the group. in other words, "don't rock the boat. i took it, and worse, so you can handle this little thing. if you can't, you're done. you're not one of us."&lt;/i&gt;

I doubt very much that any of those miners had to deal with finding semen in their lockers, sex-toys in their lunchboxes, sexual assaults and stalking by their coworkers and supervisors, rumors and grafitti (in feces) smearing them about their (supposed) sexual proclivities, and having their port-a-potty turned over and feces dumped on them.

IOW, they didn't have to take it, or worse.  And while I understand the fear/reluctance for a bystander to stand up to snivelling bullies, I don't buy that they got worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>with guys, there is this other unspoken rule that if someone complains about the things you had to endure, and as a result gets out of it, they&#8217;re out of the group. in other words, &#8220;don&#8217;t rock the boat. i took it, and worse, so you can handle this little thing. if you can&#8217;t, you&#8217;re done. you&#8217;re not one of us.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I doubt very much that any of those miners had to deal with finding semen in their lockers, sex-toys in their lunchboxes, sexual assaults and stalking by their coworkers and supervisors, rumors and grafitti (in feces) smearing them about their (supposed) sexual proclivities, and having their port-a-potty turned over and feces dumped on them.</p>
<p>IOW, they didn&#8217;t have to take it, or worse.  And while I understand the fear/reluctance for a bystander to stand up to snivelling bullies, I don&#8217;t buy that they got worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaketk</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17136</link>
		<dc:creator>jaketk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17136</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I would have even appreciated some sort of private sympathy. I don't blame any of the guys for not speaking up; &lt;b&gt;they would have been teased as well if they had.&lt;/b&gt; I think that this is the sort of thing Hugo is talking about; we all need to stand against bad behavior, not condone it with our silence.&lt;/i&gt;

the bolded part is extremely important. i went to an all-boy high school, and one of the unspoken rules was that if you saw someone being picked on and you tried to do something about it, &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; became the new pick. it's not that no one wanted to do anything. in fact, when the bullies were gone, you would have been surprised at how the boys reacted to the victim. total sympathy. but none of them wanted to be picked on, bullied, or harrassed. 

another reason at play was that most of us pretty much knew that if we were in that situation, no one would step in for us, so why put our necks out for someone who would not do the same. i think this comes into play on a much larger scale with genders because most females are not going to step in if males are harrassed. it certainly happens sometimes, but it is less common than males standing up for women. and considering how he would be ostracized, the question any guy is probably asking himself is "is this worth the crap i'm going to have to put with (because she's certainly not going to back me up)?" 

another element is that it might be considered as part of the hazing rituals. with guys, there is this other unspoken rule that if someone complains about the things you had to endure, and as a result gets out of it, they're out of the group. in other words, "don't rock the boat. i took it, and worse, so you can handle this little thing. if you can't, you're done. you're not one of us."

it isn't always like that, but i think these are at leats some of the things at play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I would have even appreciated some sort of private sympathy. I don&#8217;t blame any of the guys for not speaking up; <b>they would have been teased as well if they had.</b> I think that this is the sort of thing Hugo is talking about; we all need to stand against bad behavior, not condone it with our silence.</i></p>
<p>the bolded part is extremely important. i went to an all-boy high school, and one of the unspoken rules was that if you saw someone being picked on and you tried to do something about it, <b>you</b> became the new pick. it&#8217;s not that no one wanted to do anything. in fact, when the bullies were gone, you would have been surprised at how the boys reacted to the victim. total sympathy. but none of them wanted to be picked on, bullied, or harrassed. </p>
<p>another reason at play was that most of us pretty much knew that if we were in that situation, no one would step in for us, so why put our necks out for someone who would not do the same. i think this comes into play on a much larger scale with genders because most females are not going to step in if males are harrassed. it certainly happens sometimes, but it is less common than males standing up for women. and considering how he would be ostracized, the question any guy is probably asking himself is &#8220;is this worth the crap i&#8217;m going to have to put with (because she&#8217;s certainly not going to back me up)?&#8221; </p>
<p>another element is that it might be considered as part of the hazing rituals. with guys, there is this other unspoken rule that if someone complains about the things you had to endure, and as a result gets out of it, they&#8217;re out of the group. in other words, &#8220;don&#8217;t rock the boat. i took it, and worse, so you can handle this little thing. if you can&#8217;t, you&#8217;re done. you&#8217;re not one of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>it isn&#8217;t always like that, but i think these are at leats some of the things at play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stanton</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17135</link>
		<dc:creator>stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17135</guid>
		<description>We see the expulsion of women from the feminist movement who stand up to the misandrist rhetoric, e.g., C. H. Sommers, Camille Paglia

Karl_the_Idiot responds: "Oh please. Paglia is a neanderthal when it comes to promoting absolutist notions of gender, while Sommers doesn't seem to think rape's that big a deal.Neither one of them is a feminist."

This point has always been the easiest one to demonstrate regarding feminism, because there is always a loyal feminist ready to pop up and prove it for you. Karl did the service this time. Thanks, buddy! We could try a few more: Cathy Young, Wendy MacElroy. Would you care to do the honors, Karl, or would you like to let someone else have a turn?  :-)

Let's go about this another way. Karl_the_Idiot, can you name ANY feminists in good standing who consistently stand up to misandrist rhetoric? Or don't you believe in feminist misandrist rhetoric?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We see the expulsion of women from the feminist movement who stand up to the misandrist rhetoric, e.g., C. H. Sommers, Camille Paglia</p>
<p>Karl_the_Idiot responds: &#8220;Oh please. Paglia is a neanderthal when it comes to promoting absolutist notions of gender, while Sommers doesn&#8217;t seem to think rape&#8217;s that big a deal.Neither one of them is a feminist.&#8221;</p>
<p>This point has always been the easiest one to demonstrate regarding feminism, because there is always a loyal feminist ready to pop up and prove it for you. Karl did the service this time. Thanks, buddy! We could try a few more: Cathy Young, Wendy MacElroy. Would you care to do the honors, Karl, or would you like to let someone else have a turn?  :-)</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go about this another way. Karl_the_Idiot, can you name ANY feminists in good standing who consistently stand up to misandrist rhetoric? Or don&#8217;t you believe in feminist misandrist rhetoric?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl the Idiot</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17134</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl the Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17134</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Women need to acknowledge that yes, they are responsible for the behavior they exhibit, and the behavior they choose to support, even tacitly, in their friends and family.&lt;/i&gt;

I have no idea what this is meant to mean. Is "behavior they exhibit" what someone &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt;? Are you saying "women need to acknowledge that they..are responsible for what they do" or are you saying something, uh, totally nuts like "women need to be responsible for what they inspire people to do"?

If it's #2, that's just bizarre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Women need to acknowledge that yes, they are responsible for the behavior they exhibit, and the behavior they choose to support, even tacitly, in their friends and family.</i></p>
<p>I have no idea what this is meant to mean. Is &#8220;behavior they exhibit&#8221; what someone <i>does</i>? Are you saying &#8220;women need to acknowledge that they..are responsible for what they do&#8221; or are you saying something, uh, totally nuts like &#8220;women need to be responsible for what they inspire people to do&#8221;?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s #2, that&#8217;s just bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl the Idiot</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17133</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl the Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17133</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We see the expulsion of women from the feminist movement who stand up to the misandrist rhetoric, e.g., C. H. Sommers, Camille Paglia&lt;/i&gt;

Oh please. Paglia is a neanderthal when it comes to promoting absolutist notions of gender, while Sommers doesn't seem to think rape's that big a deal.

Neither one of them is a feminist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We see the expulsion of women from the feminist movement who stand up to the misandrist rhetoric, e.g., C. H. Sommers, Camille Paglia</i></p>
<p>Oh please. Paglia is a neanderthal when it comes to promoting absolutist notions of gender, while Sommers doesn&#8217;t seem to think rape&#8217;s that big a deal.</p>
<p>Neither one of them is a feminist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandagon</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17141</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17141</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Judge who tragically lifted a restraining order stays on the bench&lt;/strong&gt;

This case actually reminds me most of the practice of punishing women for "dishonoring" their families or somehow otherwise being or doing something men in their life don't like by throwing acid on them, except this time it was in...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Judge who tragically lifted a restraining order stays on the bench</strong></p>
<p>This case actually reminds me most of the practice of punishing women for &#8220;dishonoring&#8221; their families or somehow otherwise being or doing something men in their life don&#8217;t like by throwing acid on them, except this time it was in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17132</link>
		<dc:creator>amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 03:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2005/10/31/no-more-silent-good-guys-some-thoughts-about-north-country/#comment-17132</guid>
		<description>Hugo, I appreciate the review, I've been looking forward to seeing the movie for some time and was awaiting your comments.  I've worked at two companies where I had (or could have had) credible sexual harassment claims, and another that was borderline.  Sometimes more troubling than the behavior of the harassers was the presence of those who seemed to be "good guys" and did nothing.  At one location, there were no men who stood up, not as far as I know, and it took two young women to stand up to all of them to get the smallest of results.  When things happened and I expressed shock and disgust to someone I thought of as a "good guy", it was met with a sardonic smile, shrug, and comments like, "Sometimes things get crazy around here..."  At the other place I struggled with the question of whether a supervisor could be trusted to take action, or if he would just brush it off.  It's an excruciating decision, more so I think, the more one respects the man.  I wanted to believe he would stand up, but if he wouldn't it was quite a risk to go to him.  Thankfully, I was joined again by strong young women and a man who refused to stand idly by, whether we went forward or not.  According to many, his refusal to remain silent put his career at risk.

Looking the other way when terrible things happen is indeed a problem for humanity.  We need only look at Rwanda to see the evidence of men and women turning their backs on other men and women being victimized--slaughtered in this case.  However, I think that when it comes to sexual harassment and gender issues, men are less likely than women to police their co-workers of the same gender.  I've heard women call each other out when a word or look with a male co-worker or client crosses the line.  It doesn't happen as often as it should, I'm sure, but I've only ever seen men call each other out while laughing and shaking their head or joining in.  I'll readily admit that my beliefs are not based on empirical data, but on my experiences in the real world, and rather than invalidating my opinions, I think that strengthens them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo, I appreciate the review, I&#8217;ve been looking forward to seeing the movie for some time and was awaiting your comments.  I&#8217;ve worked at two companies where I had (or could have had) credible sexual harassment claims, and another that was borderline.  Sometimes more troubling than the behavior of the harassers was the presence of those who seemed to be &#8220;good guys&#8221; and did nothing.  At one location, there were no men who stood up, not as far as I know, and it took two young women to stand up to all of them to get the smallest of results.  When things happened and I expressed shock and disgust to someone I thought of as a &#8220;good guy&#8221;, it was met with a sardonic smile, shrug, and comments like, &#8220;Sometimes things get crazy around here&#8230;&#8221;  At the other place I struggled with the question of whether a supervisor could be trusted to take action, or if he would just brush it off.  It&#8217;s an excruciating decision, more so I think, the more one respects the man.  I wanted to believe he would stand up, but if he wouldn&#8217;t it was quite a risk to go to him.  Thankfully, I was joined again by strong young women and a man who refused to stand idly by, whether we went forward or not.  According to many, his refusal to remain silent put his career at risk.</p>
<p>Looking the other way when terrible things happen is indeed a problem for humanity.  We need only look at Rwanda to see the evidence of men and women turning their backs on other men and women being victimized&#8211;slaughtered in this case.  However, I think that when it comes to sexual harassment and gender issues, men are less likely than women to police their co-workers of the same gender.  I&#8217;ve heard women call each other out when a word or look with a male co-worker or client crosses the line.  It doesn&#8217;t happen as often as it should, I&#8217;m sure, but I&#8217;ve only ever seen men call each other out while laughing and shaking their head or joining in.  I&#8217;ll readily admit that my beliefs are not based on empirical data, but on my experiences in the real world, and rather than invalidating my opinions, I think that strengthens them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
