Well, I’m home. It’s just past 7:00 in the morning, and I’m back in the office on campus cruising along on three hours sleep. Our flight home from Colombia did not land at LAX until midnight last night, and by the time we’d gotten home and settled in for bed, it was close to three.
I’ll post more about our trip in a bit. I came home to more than 100 email messages (after I deleted the spam), and that will take some time to wade through. I’ll also try and go through some of the comments, as it seems that things may have gotten out of hand again. I can say this: mentioning the name of the accuser in the Duke Lacrosse case will get you instantly and permanently banned. Turning the comments below this post into a discussion of the ethics of naming the victims in rape cases will also earn my ire, and at the very least, such comments will be rapidly deleted.
It’s good to be back.
I’m hoping this won’t earn your ire: it’s a question on the ethics of this site, only, because I’m new-ish.
Is there a policy against naming alleged victims in rape cases generally, or is it case-specific to the Duke Lacrosse case?
In all cases unless the victim/survivor has gone public.
Welcome back bach Hugo, your presence was missed.