I got an email from a reader this morning pointing me to this post at Reject the Koolaid. It’s got a new twist on how those of us in the academy can respond to the ratemyprofessors phenomenon:
Just over a year ago when Tearfree’s daughter and a friend were discovering the wonders of Google and the Internet, they decided to look up their mothers on ratemyprofessors.com, a site they’d heard the adults heatedly discussing on more than one occasion.
Tearfree’s then 10-year-old daughter was, to say the least, distressed to discover some of the not-so-nice things written about her Mom there, and, like the loyal daughter she is, she took it upon herself to set the ratemyprofessors.com record straight. “I would love to have this prof as my BFF,” she gushed online as if she were at a slumber party. Tearfree’s daughter’s friend also added some equally kind words about her own mother.
The girls were so proud of the instant results of their handiwork that the next time they got together, they decided to boost their Moms’ ratings yet again. But this time their flattering postings were removed from the site. The girls had been unmasked as users making multiple posts about the same professor from the same IP address. They’d encountered just about the only barrier ratemyprofessors.com has.
We are not told, alas, where Tearfree teaches, or what her real name is. But it certainly puts a new spin on how some of us may be getting our ratings. It gets more intriguing:
Tearfree decided earlier this year that enough was enough.
She did not take the route of more diplomatic colleagues who have appealed successfully to the managers of ratemyprofessors.com to take the worst stuff down. Nor did she follow the example of valiant professors from the social sciences who have performed complex statistical analyses of ratemyprofessors.com’s data and drawn all sorts of conclusions, including the highly obvious one that students are inclined to give top ratings to attractive easy markers. No, instead Tearfree decided she was going to go up against ratemyprofessors.com using their own dubious tactics. Thus, since the beginning of 2006, whenever she finds herself with a free moment while sitting in front of someone else’s computer – be it at the library or at her aunt’s place of employment or at the gym – Tearfree just writes herself a glowing ratemyprofessors.com review and posts it.
The only unsuccessful part of this strategy is that for some reason all the chili peppers she’s given herself, to indicate a scalding hotness rating, have failed to show up. Yet despite that small flaw, Tearfree now has one of the best ratemyprofessors.com ratings in the entire university, making herself an off-the-charts statistical anomaly and a possible footnote in that study that concluded hot easy markers almost always come out on top.
Love it! I think my project for the rest of the day will be rating all of my colleagues, giving all of them chili peppers for hotness. I will give them plaudits merited or unmerited, praising their pedagogy and their personal style to the highest heavens. Then I shall rate myself as well. If those pesky MRAs who have figured out how to disguise their IP addresses will show me how to do it, then I can do it every dang day. I’m fairly certain a small number of people have given me most of my ratings anyway, so why not add to their number with glee?
By the time I’m done, the social sciences division of Pasadena City College will have nothing but hot, brilliant, kind, helpful, erudite, inspiring faculty.
UPDATE: I may think better of my Tearfree-inspired plan. If there are students out there who have found RMP to be genuinely useful, and would rather that I not conduct a campaign of insidious civil disobedience to boost the self-esteem of my deserving and undeserving colleagues alike, let me know.
I’ve read plenty of blog entries by individuals I suspect of dishonest behavior, but this is the first I’ve read openly endorsing it.
Consider it civil disobedience. Given the lamentable popularity of RMP, doesn’t that seem somehow more noble?
Are class evaluations available to all students there? Why not instead focus on trying to make those equally available to the students (ie, online). They’re way more informative, but they’re usually really hard to access, even for current students.
No, it’s not. If intentional deception forms any part of your argument, why should the rest of us trust any other part of it? “OK, so maybe I sometimes lie to everyone, but right now I’m telling you the truth, honest!” does not inspire confidence. It’s also completely unnecessary, when so much more can be accomplished by truthfully exposing the (presumably unforged) crap that gets posted there every day. Take, for example, this review of my father (whose name and institution I’ll gladly provide by email if you like, but would not care to broadcast publicly):
If you trust a review written by some bumbling boob like that, well, you deserve what you get. Caveat lector.
Wolfa, I would support that wholeheartedly.
Look, I’ve done well by Ratemyprofessors. I’ve got more ratings than any other prof in my entire college (though I don’t know that all of them come from students.) It’s immodest to mention, but I am ranked the second hottest prof in North America by RMP — an honor I am sure I don’t deserve, and one which may have been rigged for all I know.
So much of what appears on RMP is abusive, exaggerated, and unscreened. And it is taken far too seriously by students. Therefore, a certain amount of cheerful civil disobedience seems justifiable. I may rethink my decision, of course, should RMP suddenly threaten legal action or the like.
That said, I do think a carefully controlled set of evaluations should be made available to students. But the way it currently exists, RMP is not useful.
X, I’ve gotten a couple like your dad’s. Perhaps you’re right, and we should let students hoist themselves with their own petards.
Hi, Tearfree here. I find my teaching evaluations bear no resemblance to my ratemyprofessors rating although you’ll find profs who swear theirs do.
I have some serious questions about the methodology of teaching evaluations, but I’ve certainly gleaned valuable info from them, which is way more than I can say for ratemyprofs.com
I would certainly not be opposed to having evaluations made more accessible.
What I would really like to see though is some kind of graduates’ survey with a question along the lines of, “NOw that you’re (somewhat) older and wiser, from which class did you most benefit?”
Deirdre, I didn’t realize you were “tearfree”! My bad — thanks so much for the link!
And your question is indeed an excellent one — I’d love to see what students put to it.
I’m with X. I’ve never used it for myself, because at my undergrad school, most of my classes had no choice in profs — other courses I had much better sources to ask from. I have left comments there, because at my undergrad school, there was no access to the actual evaluations. (In one dept, the profs were handed them as is, so they recognised all the majors by handwriting.) I’d have preferred real evaluations, but I couldn’t get them — a lot of people use RMP there, though, because how else do you know who to sign up for your first semester? My grad school, otoh, had them online, but again: inconvenient to get to, without the written comments, but with all the numbers and stats (avg for that course, avg for that dept, avg for that course level in that dept).
As for RMP, why not ask your students to write thoughtful evaluations of one or more prof (not — or not necessarily — you) each semester? Show examples like X’s, and say that you know people use it a lot, so it would be better if the comments were contentful instead. Stress the comments don’t need to be positive — and that you won’t be policing it. But your students seem to like and respect you — you could have a big impact that way.
Do you really feel, considering the already skewed nature of the power relationship between tenured professors and students that hijacking any criticism by stalking yourself with positive statements is really a form of “civil disobedience” - it seems instead that while on the one hand you want students to appreciate and respect your teaching methods and standards, on the other hand you think they are sheep easily led astray (by either not rating you sufficently or by believing random one liners over previous students). Yes, huzzah, you have overcome the oppression of….an internet gossip site?
X, for a long time, I thought like you. No one’s going to believe it so who cares. But then a student posted a comment saying I was anti-black, meaning anti-African American or Canadian (in my case.)
This threw me for a loop because I couldn’t remember ever having discussed anything to do with race in class and then I remembered. We had been discussing a work of fiction where a character complained that yuppies don’t tip and that led to a discussion of tipping. And I said, there were all sorts of theories out there about who tipped and who didn’t and that I’d read that women don’t tip and blacks don’t tip and yuppies didn’t tip. The student obviously processed this as “racist” and went on-line and told it to the whole world. That was basically my tipping point.
I don’t see why I should have to be subjected to that on a highly popular site which gets enough hits to rate high in Google. And I’m sorry I don’t buy your all or nothing lying thesis. I’ve always been a believer in little white lies and I’ve made my comments on ratemyprofs over the top enough that if they don’t generate healthy skepticism, well, buyer beware.
As a grad student, I find that reading the undergrad’s assessments on RMP and then reversing them completely is a pretty useful guide.
Your ratings are almost all positive, Hugo, and well-deserved. (Even the 2nd hottest prof in the States: you have 141 chillies!) So you of all people should love Rate My Professors! It brings students to you!
But I really hope you don’t artificially inflate your colleague’s ratings. Rate My Professors does have some stupid ratings on it, but I have found it really helpful. For the most part the ratings are fairly accurate. Some of your fellow profs shouldn’t be in teaching, and students should have a chacne to know they should avoid them. When you artifically inflate their ratings, you hurt your own students.
FWIW, I found Rate My Professors for my gf after she had come home crying from a class because the “professor”, an art teacher at the Academy of Art in S.F. basically took her aside, told her how untalented she was and how she’d have no future and why was she wasting his time and hers. I showed her the site, and she proceeded to find out that yes, this WAS a continuing pattern with said teacher, that he only wants to work with whom he deigns as “talented” and will verbally abuse the student until they quit.
She is now happily over Ex’Pressions. I do understand how professors would feel about being rated like an Amazon book, but in my opinion, Rate My Professors gave my gf a perspective desperately needed after having her ego shredded by an asshole.
Tearfree again. Last comment, I swear, and then I’ll stop hijacking this thread.
I found sc’s comment very interesting as I have a lot of experience with writing programs. I used to be very friendly with a penniless creative writing student who was told he might as well give up by a famous writer teacher. He ignored that advice and went on to win major prizes and have his last book reviewed on the front page of the NYT Book Review. So yeah, there are idiots teaching this type of courses.
On the other hand I have a friend, who never disses anyone, who also teaches creative writing. Google her name and the first thing that comes up is her RTP writing talking about how she quashed a studen’t dream. Now, I also happen to know for a fact that some students can’t take constructive criticism or recognize the difference between constructive and negative criticism. So, there is nothing to say that this one student’s view is accurate.
And yet, google my friend as another friend did, trying to track down my friend’s husband, and what did she find — the RTP rating. She was so horrified by it that she brought it up with me. And the friend who did the googling, is a sceptic journalist.
So with all due respect to Elizabethe, we’re not talking here about “some internet gossip site.” We’re talking about a site that gets enough page views to have google staying power.
And wow, Hugo, 141 chilies. My Gawd, you must be hotter than Jack Bauer!
BriBri wrote: When you artifically inflate their ratings, you hurt your own students. And SC wrote: I do understand how professors would feel about being rated like an Amazon book, but in my opinion, Rate My Professors gave my gf a perspective desperately needed after having her ego shredded by an asshole.
These are possibly potent arguments against giving flattering ratings to all my colleagues. FWIW, I wasn’t planning on rating myself! I do, however, think seriously about giving chili peppers to all my colleagues as an ego boost.
Deirdre says: And wow, Hugo, 141 chilies. My Gawd, you must be hotter than Jack Bauer!
No one is hotter than Jack Bauer. And I can think of three of my colleagues I consider to be hotter than me…
Especially after reading your post, Deirdre, I’m convinced most of those “hot” ratings come from just one or two devoted fans. Still, I notice I am not that far out of first place. Whether taking over first place from that Canadian dude would constitute a feather in my cap, I don’t know! ;-)
This actually reminds me a great deal of a local politician who was found out after a two year letter writing campaign where he was writing letters about how much he did for the community under the names of several different teenage girls (he was about 55). He couldn’t see the problem since he knew he did a good job.
Now one might argue that politicians are public figures who affect thousands of people and they need to understand that good and bad reviews as well as people easily offended or impossible to please come with the territory as devoted fans. While tenure teachers might only affect up to a few hundred a year; they are in thier own way public figures as well. Every poet who stands in front of mike on open mike night has to realize they no longer have control over what people think of thier work, and though people may have paid money to learn from you, they essentially are paying to hear you speak and after that you don’t have control over thier opinions either. And quite frankly, the resistance and need to create an intellectual basis on how a bunch of people giving reviews of teachersperformances as a bad thing disturbs me. It particularly disturbs me on a blog that quite openly discusses different ways teachers evaluate students (like sexually rating them), or how great it is to have a special student, or even the nature of student crushes. Well, there is that side of teaching and now there is Rate My Professor.
I hope that most long term teachers realize that they are not universally effective to every student - some will resonate, some won’t; some will love the course, some won’t; some will think you are the wisdom of the ages; some will think that you are the cause of all thier problems. And yes, now that is all going on openly in cyberspace and there is not a lot a teacher can do about it (unless you want to pretend to be a bunch of 18 and 19 year olds?). It is the cost of being, in many ways, an artist. You want to help shape minds and make a difference - well this is the cost. Certainly they can’t say anything about you that hasn’t been said about what are now considered the most influential writers and thinkers. Negative reviews are part of the business; as is getting googled I guess (journalists shouldn’t be surprised at this since most employers aren’t). I suppose one can either copy the writer Pope and get two giant dog for unleasing on ones critics or accept that nothing inspires bile faster than a C in a lazy student and just get on teaching.
I gave my sixty-something year old English professor a chili because I thought his mad genius mind was “hot.” I’m the only one to have given him a chili. Of course, my crushes have always been kind of weird: dirty metalhead, retired English teacher, Jeremy. HA!
At any rate, I admit that I find RMP useful to some degree because SOME of the comments are thoughtful and intelligent, though I feel guilty about using them waaaaaay to seriously them when selecting my classes. Another sad thing is that it’s seeping into our language. When discussing classes with my friends, we sometimes ask each other if our prof has a chili. My mom even asks me if any of my teachers have chilies. Sheesh!
Like Wolfa, I doubt I ever would/could have used RMP. Most of my classes with multiple teachers I chose based on timing, and the rest (a majority) were taught by only one prof anyway.
I guess I don’t mind a place where people can post their feelings about their professors, but I really don’t like the idea of rating a prof’s hotness. As if hotness or lack thereof had anything to do with how well one resonates with a professor! Feh.
Hi Hugo.
Hugo…I have a question about a certain History Professor at PCC; a tenured one at that. I took his American History course at the same time I took your European course.
On the first day of class he told us that 70% of the class would eventually fail or drop out. There were over 40 students in the first week of class, and I was 1 of 9 to take the final exam. An honor student whom I now attend cal with, dropped the course after receiving his first D at PCC after the first midterm. He asked me daily if “my train has been derailed yet?” when I would walk into class. This guy is no friend, mentor, or professor to his students, he is a bully. When I scored a 102% on the final after I told him I’d need at least a B to get into Cal, he gave me the solid C. The C+ which haunts to me this day on my GPA for grad school, even though he made a deal with the class that if any student received an A on the final exam they would receive an A in the course.
On one occasion he came into class 10 minututes late, on his cell phone. He asked us a single question and when no student answered it, he told us we did not try hard enough; he got back on his cell phone and walked out of class for the day. The guy is horrible and needs to be replaced. My question is, have you heard any horror stories from other students about this self-proclaimed ex-marine?
My point to all this, as it refers to ratemyprofessor.com is that I was warned about this guy from ratemyprofessor.com and with few exceptions, it is a very valuable tool in considering a professor to give your time, attention, emotions, future, and mind to. To some extent, you are only as good as your ratemyprofessor ratings. Oh yeah, and this guy not only has quite a few “hot” ratings and flattering comments directed towards his physical shell, but all females in the course at the time considered him a “creep,” which is a more realistic interpretation of the guy.
Hugo - seems to me that part of your tact goes against what you advocate here so often. Go ahead and praise the pedagogy of your peers (merited or not), but why include the “hotness” aspect?
I would think, instead of gaming the system with “cheerful” disobediance, an “academy” response to the RMP effect might focus on a coordinated effort to cure the underlying problems that give rise to a RMP type outlet. If most institutions that profess to claim teaching as an important mission would devote resources to developing, executing, and disseminating valid and useful student evaluations, then RMP like sites would have less substantive influence (although I suspect the lure for slacker students would remain). Maybe the “academy” should develop a “rate our college president” site to make the point..
Perhaps the above solution is a “global” one. I would still think a “local” solution is forcing RMP to realize the stated purpose on its webiste by flagging every rating that violates RMP’s *supposed* guidelines to ensure ratings focus on the professional abilities of professors [[ limit your comments to the professor’s professional abilities; (DO NOT) Criticize the way a professor looks or dresses. Appearances have little to do with a professor’s ability to teach the material; (DO NOT) Include sexual innuendo in your comment(s)]], advocating more creative ways to exploit the student admin position, and challenging RMP to create an accompanying professor rebuttal option on a limited number of entries.
Col, you’ll get no argument from me here:
If most institutions that profess to claim teaching as an important mission would devote resources to developing, executing, and disseminating valid and useful student evaluations, then RMP like sites would have less substantive influence…
Indeed.
Anthony, I think I know the colleague to whom you refer. As a fellow PCC professor, I apologize that your experience was so negative! Like the comments from Bri and sc above, it at least makes me rethink my little plan to follow deirdre’s (tearfree) example. Perhaps following the Colonel’s suggestion and developing a more thoughtful version of RMP is the answer, one that excludes the bizarre personal attacks and nonsense, as well as the hotness factor.
My little sister is just starting classes as a freshman this week and started checking out her teachers on myspace’s “professor grading” section. Her favorite review:
Hopefully people who don’t like passionate feminists will stay away from this one, but it made my sister happy after years of harsh conservative Christians in high school. The other reviews refer to her teaching style and knowledge, btw, not her ideological stance, and give her pretty high scores.
I’ve personally taken the time to go back and add reviews to professors I took classes with years ago, especially good ones that I noticed got a bum rap from having to teach awful freshmen intro classes with heavy workloads. If you feel like it, I do think encouraging your students to leave honest and (hopefully) more substantive reviews would be a good thing.
My little sister is just starting classes as a freshman this week and started checking out her teachers on myspace’s “professor grading” section.
Is that different from Ratemyprofessors? Myspace has its own separate system??
Heavens.
Yeah, but it’s pretty informal - no “hotness rating” and they break it down by sections a little so you can see composite judgements and hopefully the students have to think a little bit. For instance:
Lectures: A
Homework: B
Tests: B
Fairness: A+
Grading: A+
Accessibility: A+
Final: A
Obviously you have to login to myspace to view them, but it doesn’t link the reviews to the posters - and you can only see the “final” grade by the review.
I think it’s part of their attempts to rival facebook - they have other sections of the site for schools. You can search students & alumni by major and year, for instance, and there are group discussion boards. My college, Wheaton, has a couple long discussions about homosexuality, that have older alumni talking to present students about experiences then & now. (My sister isn’t going there, fwiw)
That sounds, Vacula, as if the Myspace version of rating professors is actually more sensible, which seems surprising (given my admittedly limited experience with Myspace.)
And I have even less knowledge of Facebook. But I’m still jealous of the Canadian dude who is the hottest prof in North America (according to RMP). (H/T/: Deirdre).
RMP asks for three qualities: easiness, helpfulness, clarity. Fairness isn’t one of their components, and that might be particularly useful, given the comments I’ve seen here.
Out of curiosity I went and looked up your reviews - lots of positive ones, a few who don’t like your beliefs and a number of very silly innappropriate ones (I just checked back to copy something out and several I flagged are already gone).
Just in case you wondered::
Schwyzer, Hugo - Pasadena City College - Pasadena -Social Science
Lectures: A+
Homework: A+
Tests: A
Fairness: C+
Grading: A
Accessibility: A+
Final: A+
One negative review says you have an “ecocentric personality”. :)
I LOVE that I am thought of as “ecocentric”! That’s truly marvelous. I strive for ecocentrism, but I need to do more to reduce my carbon footprint. Thanks, Vacula!
I don’t like that the “fairness” quality is dramatically lower than the others. Of course, fairness has a double meaning, doesn’t it? It could refer to being fair in one’s grading, or it could refer to being unbiased in one’s approach to the material…
Hugo, your repentance behind enemy lines is much appreciated; however, for it to count more than Steve Centanni’s conversion to Islam, it might be worth your while to ratify it here.
Fine, X, here is what I wrote at your place:
Okay, for cryin’ out loud, I give. You’re right. I liked the idea, but you’ve appealed to my better nature (and to my selfish desire to be taken seriously), and I repent.
I’ve let go of the temptation to run out and rate my colleagues and give them all “fives” and “chilies”. I’ve been “guilted” successfully. I still understand why Deirdre did what she did, and does what she does, and I sympathise.
Hi all,
Just a brief update. Over at Xrlq I’ve been compared with someone who deliberately lies to get on a jury.
So, I’ll say what I said over there. I don’t consider this lying. I consider it sock puppet satirizing. Nor do I consider it stooping to the level of RMP abusers because I do not ever slag anyone off online. I merely say wonderfully over-the-top things abot myself.
dd
Just to clarify, I do not equate sock puppetry with perjury. Both are dishonest behaviors, which was my general point, but they’re not equally bad, nor even close. Oddly enough, the guy who advocates perjury, Radley Balko, appears equally indignant over some allegedly speculating that if he’ll lie under oath in court, he might lie on his blog, too!
XR, you seem to feel that all institutions deserve repect be they good, bad or indifferent. RMP is laughable and I fail to see that I should accord it respect simply because it exists, which appears to be what you advocate. Not being a yank nor a lwa prof, I’m not familiar enough with Balko’s subject matter to have an opinion, but certainly his message that there’s somthing highly problematic about insisting “just the facts, not the law” resonates.
I think I will create a completely fake RMP persona for myself and ask my blog readers to give her enough chilis to get to the very top of RMP’s list.
So, I ask you all, should Deirdre Dashwoo teach women’s studies or quantum physics or post colonial Sokalian science?
Being both a student an adjunct professor (heaven help us!) at major universities, I can see both sides of this.
There needs to be a venue for giving feedback to professors early on in a course. Often, shortfalls can be corrected early on. I find when teaching that you have to read a lot of student interpersonal language to figure how you are doing.
I’m generally so pro RMP! Even if I hadn’t found it generally helpful,as long as you all are giving us ratings that will become part of our permanent records and actually potentially affect our future plans, I have no patience for profs complaining of some unfairness or arbitrariness on this website….
FTR, I would prefer if we got thoughtful written evaluations from each prof rather than letters of the alphabet, and correspondingly gave back thoughful written evaluations of them.
Tara, I would love to be able to give thoughtful, written evaluations — and receive them in return. Alas, I teach over 300 students per semester, with no TA help on grading. I’m also given 72 hours between the final and the due date for grades. No possibility for lengthy evaluation on my part, alas!
As I’ve said, I’ve done fairly well by RMP. I don’t take RMP as seriously as I do the student evaluations administered in my classes (only once every three years now that I’m tenured). But of course, my students never get to see what other students said on those evals. RMP does provide an opportunity for feedback that is valuable. It also provides an opportunity for the spiteful to unjustly malign the repuations of good teachers. I’ve had a few folks on RMP accuse me of the most extraordinary things (Nazism and pedophilia, though both posts were eventually deleted by the RMP moderators.) I’ve also seen some really nasty things said about my colleagues.
And how seriously can you take RMP when these two men are number one and number two on the list of hottest profs in North America?
I’m pretty sure from the context that “ecocentric” was a typo’d “egocentric,” but I thought you’d appreciate it.
From what I saw of your detractors there I think you can feel free to interpret criticism of your fairness as disagreement with your ideas. Other than the outraged conservative students there weren’t any references to unfair behavior. The only criticism that sounded at all problematic was a Gonz-like “go with the flow and you’ll get a good grade no matter how galling it is” - which is dishonest and hopefully not encouraged.
I am the founder of RMP, and proud of it. The system is not perfect, but it’s a whole lot better than nothing, which is what students would have if RMP weren’t available. Notice that almost no schools had their evals posted online until they were dragged kicking and screaming to do it by RMP’s popularity. And most schools are still just kicking and screaming, with no evals in sight.
My next website is RateMDs.com (http://ratemds.com), for rating medical doctors. For you profs who frown upon RMP, please do not use RateMDs when choosing your doctors; instead, I suggest you let natural selection take its course. By doing so, my friend says IQ scores will rise by about five points over the next two generations. I am not so optimistic.
John, what controls could be put into place to ensure that only those who had actually taken a course could rate the instructor — as opposed to the instructor rating herself, or being rated by ex-lovers, the mailman, etc? It’s hard to take the site seriously as long as anyone with a computer can rate anyone else.
Hugo, there is no way any website can ensure that every rater took a course with the ratee. The only way to even get close is to get the cooperation of the universities. Will they give this cooperation? Hell no! The last thing they want is to give access to the evaluations to the students. Decades of keeping this data secret proves my point.
Because not all the data can be proven valid, some people say that all the data should be removed, regardless of any First Amendment issues. To them I ask, what words would you be able to utter in your daily life if you had to prove their authenticity? You’d be able to talk about the weather, and that’s about it. And even those words would often be false. Removing data that students generally find useful is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
John, the purpose of evaluations is to give teachers feedback — not to help students pick an easy course.
Look, I should love RMP — I’m fairly highly rated, I have lots of those chili things, and most comments are reasonably complimentary. But knowing that it it is incredibly easy to falsify what’s on there makes it a highly unreliable template for evaluating teaching.
There may be a baby in the bathwater, but he’s difficult to see through all the algae. And I think he’s pooped in the tub…
John - Again, if the purpose of the site was to provide an alternative outlet to withheld information, why add (and emphasize!) the “hotness” rating. Did I miss that section on all the student evaluations I have done??
Your site links to an article summarizing a NEBR working paper on the “beauty in the classroom” that suggests “Instructors who
are viewed as better looking receive higher instructional ratings, with the impact of a move from the 10th to the 90th percentile of beauty being substantial. This impact exists within university
departments and even within particular courses, and is larger for male than for female instructors.”
However, not mentioned in the article is the authors own admission that “Disentangling whether this outcome represents productivity or discrimination is, as with the issue generally, probably impossible.” (sorry, Hugo).
Although I object to the use of “hotness” as a criteria, I find it more offensive that you pass it off as some reliable measure of value to students who can’t get the formal evaluations. Just stick with your first response “Because it’s fun!” or perhaps be more honest and say “because it’s the hook that gets people coming to and talking about my site.”
No apology necessary, Col. Steve, you’re on the money here. The chili peppers undercut the legitimacy of the site as much as its inability to limit itself to actual students.
At very least, shouldn’t it be possible to ask the reviewers to register using e-mails in the proper domain name? (Like Facebook does?)It wouldn’t need to show their registration information, of course, but that would be a big step towards current, accurate information.
Absolutely, Vacula. If all of my ratings came from someone with a pasadena.edu account, I’d take them much more seriously. Of course, I’d lose all the nice compliments my mother has surely given me! ;-)
I don’t know whether your mother rated you or not, Mr. Schwyzer, but I have and I gave you very high scores on ratemyprofessor. And a chili pepper. I like the chili pepper ratings, they are fun, but they would never be a reason for me to take or not take a course. Your being hot doesn’t really impact your teaching or your student’s learning. It just makes you nice to look at.
Hugo,
I do realize the constraints with evaluations… it’s just not realistic now.
Something *really* frustrating to me is that every semester we’re nagged to fill out detailed course evaluations that will benefit the university and the profs, and then… vanish!
I am glad we have some venue to share information, and I think that the cure to bad reviews in this case, is more reviews. The more reviews a prof has, the better idea you can get of them and better insight into whether certain reviewers are just out there compared to others.
Oh Hugo I was talking to my ex about you and ratemyprofessor today, and he admitted that he absolutely trashed you on ratemyprof last year, gave you all “ones” and a “not hot” It’s because I had told him you were a hottie, and he was pissed, and he was never your student. Goes to show you!!!
Can you find out if ratings can get taken off once they have been put up? Does John know how to do that?