<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The first task for pro-feminist men: self-transformation</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Self-transformation and the challenges of unpacking privilege</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28810</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Self-transformation and the challenges of unpacking privilege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28810</guid>
		<description>[...] In Feminism is for Everybody, bell hooks talks about fighting &#8216;the enemy within&#8217; as a foundation for individual feminist activism. I&#8217;m not sure foundation is the right word, because in my mind it obscures the ongoing nature of challenging oneself in this manner. But quibbles about word choice aside, I think she&#8217;s right. Hugo posted recently about self-transformation as the first step for pro-feminist men. It took me a while to realise what was niggling at me in reading his post, but really it comes down to the fact that this is an important task for all of us. We need to look carefully at and unpack the way we react to and act towards others, and how institutionalised *isms inform those actions and reactions. Part of that unpacking is listening to those others, and hearing the voices that are often marginalised by dominant groups (not always intentionally, but sadly often so). And as I&#8217;ve said above, all of that unpacking is hard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Feminism is for Everybody, bell hooks talks about fighting &#8216;the enemy within&#8217; as a foundation for individual feminist activism. I&#8217;m not sure foundation is the right word, because in my mind it obscures the ongoing nature of challenging oneself in this manner. But quibbles about word choice aside, I think she&#8217;s right. Hugo posted recently about self-transformation as the first step for pro-feminist men. It took me a while to realise what was niggling at me in reading his post, but really it comes down to the fact that this is an important task for all of us. We need to look carefully at and unpack the way we react to and act towards others, and how institutionalised *isms inform those actions and reactions. Part of that unpacking is listening to those others, and hearing the voices that are often marginalised by dominant groups (not always intentionally, but sadly often so). And as I&#8217;ve said above, all of that unpacking is hard. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28510</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28510</guid>
		<description>Antigone,

I remember my friends of the early 1980's - who had stopped battering their female partners.   Now some of their partners wanted them to be the same - "pseudo macho" males - just without the battering.   For the men, stopping their battering - relied upon them viewing themselves and others differently.   They no longer could nor wanted to be "the same men".   This ended some relationships.

Obviously - you or those you care about may chose "compliance" as you put it.  To me that's a good solution - like convincing Georgie in D.C.- to nudge his Iraq Policy - just a tinge - "it'll be ok" - that's b.s. in my book.

I think that we men are hurting - and need to work to change ourselves.  You may disagree.

Thanks~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antigone,</p>
<p>I remember my friends of the early 1980&#8217;s - who had stopped battering their female partners.   Now some of their partners wanted them to be the same - &#8220;pseudo macho&#8221; males - just without the battering.   For the men, stopping their battering - relied upon them viewing themselves and others differently.   They no longer could nor wanted to be &#8220;the same men&#8221;.   This ended some relationships.</p>
<p>Obviously - you or those you care about may chose &#8220;compliance&#8221; as you put it.  To me that&#8217;s a good solution - like convincing Georgie in D.C.- to nudge his Iraq Policy - just a tinge - &#8220;it&#8217;ll be ok&#8221; - that&#8217;s b.s. in my book.</p>
<p>I think that we men are hurting - and need to work to change ourselves.  You may disagree.</p>
<p>Thanks~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antigone</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28509</link>
		<dc:creator>Antigone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28509</guid>
		<description>I disagree, Jorge.

Men and women need to change.  Humanity is fairly f*cked up right now.  I think feminism is a good vehicle for change in women, and compliance for men.  Men need their own vehicle to change themselves: I don't think the feminist community is as well-equipped for it.  Compliance means you don't beat your wife, change means you don't because you don't want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, Jorge.</p>
<p>Men and women need to change.  Humanity is fairly f*cked up right now.  I think feminism is a good vehicle for change in women, and compliance for men.  Men need their own vehicle to change themselves: I don&#8217;t think the feminist community is as well-equipped for it.  Compliance means you don&#8217;t beat your wife, change means you don&#8217;t because you don&#8217;t want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28505</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28505</guid>
		<description>I think that the word "Feminism" related to a potential future Men's Movement may seem a little misleading.   Inevitably such a movement will need to work towards "men's interests" in a new way.   Such a movement might start looking at how we men hurt and even kill each other and ourselves as well as are "the weaker gender" in so many ways (life expectancy the most visible one).   Male violence directed at both men (fighting, gang violence, etc.) as well as at women (rape, domestic violence) and children (of course) might be an important part of this.   Finding a new meaning for "respect" might be relevant.   Homophobia certainly is critical - our emotional identities as "Not Girls" and later "Not Women" - often imprisons us as we fear the rejection (and injury) from other males (as well as women).

Another part of a future Men's Movement is seeing our life roles differently.   It was no coincidence that AIDS support work in the U.S. had such a tiny, tiny proportion of Het Men.   AIDS wasn't seen as relevant to us in general - e.g. "straight men don't get AIDS so Why should I do the work?"   I never saw the depths of the role of being a Father until I became one.   Men often don't see the importance of people with disabilities until or unless disability directly affects their lives.   Aging is often similar.

Women are often different in "taking care of others" - children, parents, grandparents, or simply those who may benefit from care and support.   We men often "don't see beyond our noses" - from playing as a boy independently (not caring for younger siblings) to our sports and other pleasures (while women take care of things).

There are Many exceptions of course!

Our former male roles as: soldier, breadwinner, "boss", "head of household" are often disappearing.   Far too many of us are caught in a narcisistic web - of "self actualization" - which doesn't do much for others or build bonds that will help us as we need help in our future lives.

Feminism is very important in all of this!   In the end though we will need to find new ways of bonding with: men, women, children and ourselves.   I try to explore some of this in my blog: www.geoisphere.blogspot.com as well as our group blog at: www.feministallies.blogspot.com.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the word &#8220;Feminism&#8221; related to a potential future Men&#8217;s Movement may seem a little misleading.   Inevitably such a movement will need to work towards &#8220;men&#8217;s interests&#8221; in a new way.   Such a movement might start looking at how we men hurt and even kill each other and ourselves as well as are &#8220;the weaker gender&#8221; in so many ways (life expectancy the most visible one).   Male violence directed at both men (fighting, gang violence, etc.) as well as at women (rape, domestic violence) and children (of course) might be an important part of this.   Finding a new meaning for &#8220;respect&#8221; might be relevant.   Homophobia certainly is critical - our emotional identities as &#8220;Not Girls&#8221; and later &#8220;Not Women&#8221; - often imprisons us as we fear the rejection (and injury) from other males (as well as women).</p>
<p>Another part of a future Men&#8217;s Movement is seeing our life roles differently.   It was no coincidence that AIDS support work in the U.S. had such a tiny, tiny proportion of Het Men.   AIDS wasn&#8217;t seen as relevant to us in general - e.g. &#8220;straight men don&#8217;t get AIDS so Why should I do the work?&#8221;   I never saw the depths of the role of being a Father until I became one.   Men often don&#8217;t see the importance of people with disabilities until or unless disability directly affects their lives.   Aging is often similar.</p>
<p>Women are often different in &#8220;taking care of others&#8221; - children, parents, grandparents, or simply those who may benefit from care and support.   We men often &#8220;don&#8217;t see beyond our noses&#8221; - from playing as a boy independently (not caring for younger siblings) to our sports and other pleasures (while women take care of things).</p>
<p>There are Many exceptions of course!</p>
<p>Our former male roles as: soldier, breadwinner, &#8220;boss&#8221;, &#8220;head of household&#8221; are often disappearing.   Far too many of us are caught in a narcisistic web - of &#8220;self actualization&#8221; - which doesn&#8217;t do much for others or build bonds that will help us as we need help in our future lives.</p>
<p>Feminism is very important in all of this!   In the end though we will need to find new ways of bonding with: men, women, children and ourselves.   I try to explore some of this in my blog: <a href="http://www.geoisphere.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.geoisphere.blogspot.com</a> as well as our group blog at: <a href="http://www.feministallies.blogspot.com." rel="nofollow">http://www.feministallies.blogspot.com.</a></p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28499</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28499</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Did you miss the bit about patience and forgiveness? I’m not interested in punishment, I’m interested in change. I’m interested in asking men to consider living differently, matching language and life.&lt;/i&gt;

Men don't need to change.  Men are fine the way they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Did you miss the bit about patience and forgiveness? I’m not interested in punishment, I’m interested in change. I’m interested in asking men to consider living differently, matching language and life.</i></p>
<p>Men don&#8217;t need to change.  Men are fine the way they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28486</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28486</guid>
		<description>Clever, I assure you I don't merely muse in cyberspace.  I live this out, as best I can, with my family, with the youth I mentor, with my teaching.  It's of course best done in relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever, I assure you I don&#8217;t merely muse in cyberspace.  I live this out, as best I can, with my family, with the youth I mentor, with my teaching.  It&#8217;s of course best done in relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clever Allusion</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28479</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever Allusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28479</guid>
		<description>I didn't miss it.  I condemn it ("gentle and corrective") as the pretense that it is, like "matching language and life."  

Hypocrisy is a high and wide target.  Perhaps the thoroughgoing moral and political transformation that you plan deserves a more humane approach than applying the Internet's cliches about "holding people accountable" for whatever one holds people accountable for and "calling people on" whatever one calls people on.

Put another way, the weapons of the weak are weapons nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t miss it.  I condemn it (&#8221;gentle and corrective&#8221;) as the pretense that it is, like &#8220;matching language and life.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Hypocrisy is a high and wide target.  Perhaps the thoroughgoing moral and political transformation that you plan deserves a more humane approach than applying the Internet&#8217;s cliches about &#8220;holding people accountable&#8221; for whatever one holds people accountable for and &#8220;calling people on&#8221; whatever one calls people on.</p>
<p>Put another way, the weapons of the weak are weapons nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28477</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28477</guid>
		<description>Did you miss the bit about patience and forgiveness?  I'm not interested in punishment, I'm interested in change.  I'm interested in asking men to consider living differently, matching language and life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you miss the bit about patience and forgiveness?  I&#8217;m not interested in punishment, I&#8217;m interested in change.  I&#8217;m interested in asking men to consider living differently, matching language and life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clever Allusion</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28476</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever Allusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2006/11/30/the-first-task-for-pro-feminist-men-self-transformation/#comment-28476</guid>
		<description>Inventing new offenses, promising that the punishments will be only gentle and corrective, targeting the dissonance between what we tell each other and our secret dreams.  

Nietzsche warns us to beware those in whom the urge to punish is strong.  The urge seems particularly strong in the man with his own oft-mentioned sins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inventing new offenses, promising that the punishments will be only gentle and corrective, targeting the dissonance between what we tell each other and our secret dreams.  </p>
<p>Nietzsche warns us to beware those in whom the urge to punish is strong.  The urge seems particularly strong in the man with his own oft-mentioned sins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
