<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reprinting a lost oldie on anti-feminist young women</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enough</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-42450</link>
		<dc:creator>Enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 00:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-42450</guid>
		<description>I was always a feminist, although when I was younger I tended to call myself an "equalist" instead. I learned very young to stand up for myself and demand to be treated well - and I paid for that stance over and over. I grew up in a chauvinist farm family, where my father made it clear that he valued his sons over his daughters. It used to drive us girls batty - to the point where we would chase the boys up trees and keep them there with broomsticks until dad got home - because we were mad at them for being treated better than us, even though it wasn't the fault of our brothers.

It was a different kind of chauvinism than most people think of though. My parents made it clear that we could work as hard and do all the same work that the boys did - but they also made it clear that we were expected to the "women's work" as well - while the boys were exempted from that. So on the farm we girls worked with animals and machinery and drove tractors and everything else the boys did - and then were expected to go in and cook dinner, clean the house, and look after the younger kids, while dad and the boys got to lounge around in the living room. If I complained or disagreed - which I did frequently and strenuously as I got older - I got smacked around. And as I was told, when one such event was witnessed by a neighbour lady, "It's your own fault for embarrassing your father."

I'm 36 years old. I grew up in the 70's and 80's. That's not so long ago. And while the chauvinism I experience today is not as blatant as what I grew up with, it still happens. I'm not whining, Hailey - I know what I've dealt with my whole life. I don't spit in the face of my sisters in law when they choose to be stay at home moms. Nor do I spit at my sisters who have chosen to remain childless, although I do find it amusing that it's my brothers who have traditional marriages and children, while my sisters run the gamut from permanently single to "living in sin" to married-but-adamently-childless.

By the way, Hailey, I don't have a victim mentality and I find it insulting of you to say so. If I were a victim, I wouldn't have fought so hard to be where I am today. I would have accepted my father's belief that I was a lesser being than his sons and followed the life plan he expected of his daughters. Instead, I moved away from home at 16, worked my way through university, landed some good jobs - and still watch my career get stalled while male co-workers with less experience get promoted over me. Or I find out that new hires make as much as me or more, even though I've been at the company for over 7 years. Sure, I take steps, I fight back, and eventually bosses apologise, situations and salaries improve. I've learned the hard way that it's not enough to do just do a good job, to be as good as or better than your co-workers. I wish that the results of my efforts were enough - but it's not. Instead, it's choice between fighting a never-ending battle for recognition or being a faceless cog in the machine while other people get the credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always a feminist, although when I was younger I tended to call myself an &#8220;equalist&#8221; instead. I learned very young to stand up for myself and demand to be treated well - and I paid for that stance over and over. I grew up in a chauvinist farm family, where my father made it clear that he valued his sons over his daughters. It used to drive us girls batty - to the point where we would chase the boys up trees and keep them there with broomsticks until dad got home - because we were mad at them for being treated better than us, even though it wasn&#8217;t the fault of our brothers.</p>
<p>It was a different kind of chauvinism than most people think of though. My parents made it clear that we could work as hard and do all the same work that the boys did - but they also made it clear that we were expected to the &#8220;women&#8217;s work&#8221; as well - while the boys were exempted from that. So on the farm we girls worked with animals and machinery and drove tractors and everything else the boys did - and then were expected to go in and cook dinner, clean the house, and look after the younger kids, while dad and the boys got to lounge around in the living room. If I complained or disagreed - which I did frequently and strenuously as I got older - I got smacked around. And as I was told, when one such event was witnessed by a neighbour lady, &#8220;It&#8217;s your own fault for embarrassing your father.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 36 years old. I grew up in the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s. That&#8217;s not so long ago. And while the chauvinism I experience today is not as blatant as what I grew up with, it still happens. I&#8217;m not whining, Hailey - I know what I&#8217;ve dealt with my whole life. I don&#8217;t spit in the face of my sisters in law when they choose to be stay at home moms. Nor do I spit at my sisters who have chosen to remain childless, although I do find it amusing that it&#8217;s my brothers who have traditional marriages and children, while my sisters run the gamut from permanently single to &#8220;living in sin&#8221; to married-but-adamently-childless.</p>
<p>By the way, Hailey, I don&#8217;t have a victim mentality and I find it insulting of you to say so. If I were a victim, I wouldn&#8217;t have fought so hard to be where I am today. I would have accepted my father&#8217;s belief that I was a lesser being than his sons and followed the life plan he expected of his daughters. Instead, I moved away from home at 16, worked my way through university, landed some good jobs - and still watch my career get stalled while male co-workers with less experience get promoted over me. Or I find out that new hires make as much as me or more, even though I&#8217;ve been at the company for over 7 years. Sure, I take steps, I fight back, and eventually bosses apologise, situations and salaries improve. I&#8217;ve learned the hard way that it&#8217;s not enough to do just do a good job, to be as good as or better than your co-workers. I wish that the results of my efforts were enough - but it&#8217;s not. Instead, it&#8217;s choice between fighting a never-ending battle for recognition or being a faceless cog in the machine while other people get the credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hailey</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-40215</link>
		<dc:creator>Hailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-40215</guid>
		<description>I'm someone who would never identify myself as a feminist. I'm a young wife and mother in my 20's who completed a degree before marrying and beginning a family. I am fortunate to have the option to stay home.

In my view feminists have a victim mentality and they do not embrace the fullness of choices available for women. They symbolically spit on women who are wives and mothers first rather than focusing on their careers.

I would never say I was a feminist. I'm not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m someone who would never identify myself as a feminist. I&#8217;m a young wife and mother in my 20&#8217;s who completed a degree before marrying and beginning a family. I am fortunate to have the option to stay home.</p>
<p>In my view feminists have a victim mentality and they do not embrace the fullness of choices available for women. They symbolically spit on women who are wives and mothers first rather than focusing on their careers.</p>
<p>I would never say I was a feminist. I&#8217;m not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-39334</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-39334</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;On the latter count, you have to admit that the effects of sexism in modern America are somewhat subtle.&lt;/I&gt;

No, they're not, at all. They're less blatant than formerly, and they're not enshrined in law anymore; it's no longer legal to grant pensions to widows while denying them to widowers, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>On the latter count, you have to admit that the effects of sexism in modern America are somewhat subtle.</i></p>
<p>No, they&#8217;re not, at all. They&#8217;re less blatant than formerly, and they&#8217;re not enshrined in law anymore; it&#8217;s no longer legal to grant pensions to widows while denying them to widowers, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vir Modestus</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-39328</link>
		<dc:creator>Vir Modestus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-39328</guid>
		<description>When I was in grad school in the early 90s, my eventual sister-in-law was completing her undergrad at the same school in Madison WI. We have a feminist bookstore called "A Room of One's Own" and my SiL had to purchase a textbook from the store for a women's studies class. The book wasn't available through the campus bookstore. She was indignant at having to into one of "those" places. She wasn't a feminist, so why should she even have to patronize the place! I'm not sure if I helped or not, but when she asked me to go in there for her -- a guy, no less! -- I did, buying the book for her.

She was just like the woman in the Apple store you met. She certainly didn't like me pointing out that her actions were those of a "feminist" (broadly speaking, of course): She was in school, she lived on her own with no males dictating her actions, owned her own car, etc, etc. Today, she owns and runs her own business. She has benefited from 40 years of feminist actions and denies all of it.

Feminism has done much to bring the country a long ways towards equality, but we're still far from it. I liken the incomplete successes of feminism to those of the labor union movement. And just like with labor, the right is doing a fine job of framing the discussion to efface the efforts of feminists and unionists alike, even while twisting the original meanings of those labels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in grad school in the early 90s, my eventual sister-in-law was completing her undergrad at the same school in Madison WI. We have a feminist bookstore called &#8220;A Room of One&#8217;s Own&#8221; and my SiL had to purchase a textbook from the store for a women&#8217;s studies class. The book wasn&#8217;t available through the campus bookstore. She was indignant at having to into one of &#8220;those&#8221; places. She wasn&#8217;t a feminist, so why should she even have to patronize the place! I&#8217;m not sure if I helped or not, but when she asked me to go in there for her &#8212; a guy, no less! &#8212; I did, buying the book for her.</p>
<p>She was just like the woman in the Apple store you met. She certainly didn&#8217;t like me pointing out that her actions were those of a &#8220;feminist&#8221; (broadly speaking, of course): She was in school, she lived on her own with no males dictating her actions, owned her own car, etc, etc. Today, she owns and runs her own business. She has benefited from 40 years of feminist actions and denies all of it.</p>
<p>Feminism has done much to bring the country a long ways towards equality, but we&#8217;re still far from it. I liken the incomplete successes of feminism to those of the labor union movement. And just like with labor, the right is doing a fine job of framing the discussion to efface the efforts of feminists and unionists alike, even while twisting the original meanings of those labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-38156</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/03/26/reprinting-a-lost-oldie-on-anti-feminist-young-women/#comment-38156</guid>
		<description>As I wrote about &lt;a href="http://alethiography.blogspot.com/2007/03/blog-against-sexism-day.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;on my own blog&lt;/a&gt;, I considered myself not to be a feminist when I was a teenager and young adult (and yes, I was into Ayn Rand).  I think it was a combination of a sense of fairness ("I'm a humanist", "Would it be OK to call oneself a masculinist?" etc.) and not seeing any doors currently closed to me on account of my gender (the idea that feminism was a good thing but that its work is complete).

On the latter count, you have to admit that the effects of sexism in modern America are somewhat subtle.  Women are not barred from any rights, options, careers, characteristics, etc., that men have.  That this progress is the product of feminism doesn't say anything about whether feminism is still needed today.  There are many blogs (including this one) and articles that provide good arguments about why feminism really is still needed, so I won't try to do that in this comment, but it's understandable why some women - even liberal ones - don't see sex discrimination (especially given that the general discriminatory view of women is so ingrained that it is easily missed).

The majority of my friends were always women, so I don't fit that mold.  But I did have, from early childhood, an aversion to femininity.  In a sense I was a proto-feminist, rankling when my grandmother would tell me to "act like a little lady."  But what took me until adulthood to realize is that, while a dislike of femininity is perfectly congruent (IMO) with feminist aims - femininity being a tool of the patriarchy and all - it can also be just a convenient way of being misogynistic while supporting basic gender equality.

These days I'm a politically moderate, pro-capitalist, pro-immigration, pro-globalization, pro-choice feminist of the type who would like to see sex differences completely disregarded.  Is a society that doesn't recognize any difference between male and female possible?  Maybe not, but let's keep trying to find out, while of course working hard to address the more concrete injustices perpetrated against women globally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I wrote about <a href="http://alethiography.blogspot.com/2007/03/blog-against-sexism-day.html" rel="nofollow">on my own blog</a>, I considered myself not to be a feminist when I was a teenager and young adult (and yes, I was into Ayn Rand).  I think it was a combination of a sense of fairness (&#8221;I&#8217;m a humanist&#8221;, &#8220;Would it be OK to call oneself a masculinist?&#8221; etc.) and not seeing any doors currently closed to me on account of my gender (the idea that feminism was a good thing but that its work is complete).</p>
<p>On the latter count, you have to admit that the effects of sexism in modern America are somewhat subtle.  Women are not barred from any rights, options, careers, characteristics, etc., that men have.  That this progress is the product of feminism doesn&#8217;t say anything about whether feminism is still needed today.  There are many blogs (including this one) and articles that provide good arguments about why feminism really is still needed, so I won&#8217;t try to do that in this comment, but it&#8217;s understandable why some women - even liberal ones - don&#8217;t see sex discrimination (especially given that the general discriminatory view of women is so ingrained that it is easily missed).</p>
<p>The majority of my friends were always women, so I don&#8217;t fit that mold.  But I did have, from early childhood, an aversion to femininity.  In a sense I was a proto-feminist, rankling when my grandmother would tell me to &#8220;act like a little lady.&#8221;  But what took me until adulthood to realize is that, while a dislike of femininity is perfectly congruent (IMO) with feminist aims - femininity being a tool of the patriarchy and all - it can also be just a convenient way of being misogynistic while supporting basic gender equality.</p>
<p>These days I&#8217;m a politically moderate, pro-capitalist, pro-immigration, pro-globalization, pro-choice feminist of the type who would like to see sex differences completely disregarded.  Is a society that doesn&#8217;t recognize any difference between male and female possible?  Maybe not, but let&#8217;s keep trying to find out, while of course working hard to address the more concrete injustices perpetrated against women globally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
