<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A note on language, misogyny, and Don Imus</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dar</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45377</link>
		<dc:creator>dar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45377</guid>
		<description>s'true innnit?
those kids...
some of them have hoodies!

&lt;b&gt;“Wasn’t hip-hop supposed to arouse righteous indignation? Wasn’t it supposed to be a soundtrack of liberation?”&lt;/b&gt;

i don't think so.
wasn't hip hop, like most forms of music developed last century, primarily about having fun and feeling good?
having fun and feeling good under oppression are effective forms of resistance, so it seems natural to combine your music with more overt forms of resistance.

music can form a sense of identity, giving folks something to belong to and be part of.
sometimes that something is radical and/or progressive, sometimes it is neither of those things.
more often it's a bit of lots of different somethings overlapping on some common ground, and i think hip hop is a case of just that, with the common ground being the dance hall or the street.

i don't think Kool Herc was all that much of an agitator, but he would have no doubt  learned a sense of a toaster's responsibility from the Jamaican soundsytems he drew his inspiration from, and probably from his day to day life.

see, the dance is there, and sometimes the dance needs an MC. 
she or he's got to say something to warrant being up there, and the stuff close to his or her heart will probably be the stuff that gets said.

i think sometimes people imbue hip hop(and punk, and reggae, etc.) with an inherent 'purpose' that isn't there for everyone. it's understandable that something so amazing as music has or gives us meaning, but i think that meaning is rarely unanimously agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s&#8217;true innnit?<br />
those kids&#8230;<br />
some of them have hoodies!</p>
<p><b>“Wasn’t hip-hop supposed to arouse righteous indignation? Wasn’t it supposed to be a soundtrack of liberation?”</b></p>
<p>i don&#8217;t think so.<br />
wasn&#8217;t hip hop, like most forms of music developed last century, primarily about having fun and feeling good?<br />
having fun and feeling good under oppression are effective forms of resistance, so it seems natural to combine your music with more overt forms of resistance.</p>
<p>music can form a sense of identity, giving folks something to belong to and be part of.<br />
sometimes that something is radical and/or progressive, sometimes it is neither of those things.<br />
more often it&#8217;s a bit of lots of different somethings overlapping on some common ground, and i think hip hop is a case of just that, with the common ground being the dance hall or the street.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t think Kool Herc was all that much of an agitator, but he would have no doubt  learned a sense of a toaster&#8217;s responsibility from the Jamaican soundsytems he drew his inspiration from, and probably from his day to day life.</p>
<p>see, the dance is there, and sometimes the dance needs an MC.<br />
she or he&#8217;s got to say something to warrant being up there, and the stuff close to his or her heart will probably be the stuff that gets said.</p>
<p>i think sometimes people imbue hip hop(and punk, and reggae, etc.) with an inherent &#8216;purpose&#8217; that isn&#8217;t there for everyone. it&#8217;s understandable that something so amazing as music has or gives us meaning, but i think that meaning is rarely unanimously agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45075</guid>
		<description>"Wasn’t hip-hop supposed to arouse righteous indignation? Wasn’t it supposed to be a soundtrack of liberation?"

Well, in the hands of someone like Chuck D, it was and is the most righteously indignant music there is.  The problem is that hip-hop is pretty well the perfect musical vehicle for conveying just about any sort of indignation.  For example, indignation at a woman's failure to show abject subservience to the artist.

Reclamation of racial slurs seems more defensible than comparing women to prostitutes (or, for that matter, thinking ill of people who actually are prostitutes).  I'd like to think that NWA called themselves...N because they thought that they were not being treated as free and equal human beings.  The language used by polite racists is a mask, and ugly words from the mouths of slaveholders are one way to expose an ugly truth.  But then the kids get to thinking that because NWA are cool it must be cool to call yourself an N, and so it goes.

Kids these days.  They should listen to more Public Enemy, and they should stay off my lawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wasn’t hip-hop supposed to arouse righteous indignation? Wasn’t it supposed to be a soundtrack of liberation?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, in the hands of someone like Chuck D, it was and is the most righteously indignant music there is.  The problem is that hip-hop is pretty well the perfect musical vehicle for conveying just about any sort of indignation.  For example, indignation at a woman&#8217;s failure to show abject subservience to the artist.</p>
<p>Reclamation of racial slurs seems more defensible than comparing women to prostitutes (or, for that matter, thinking ill of people who actually are prostitutes).  I&#8217;d like to think that NWA called themselves&#8230;N because they thought that they were not being treated as free and equal human beings.  The language used by polite racists is a mask, and ugly words from the mouths of slaveholders are one way to expose an ugly truth.  But then the kids get to thinking that because NWA are cool it must be cool to call yourself an N, and so it goes.</p>
<p>Kids these days.  They should listen to more Public Enemy, and they should stay off my lawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45063</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45063</guid>
		<description>Mermade, that has never been my position.  It is the position of a great many feminists, however, and that was the context in which I was making the remark -- many feminists (Inga Muscio most famously, these days) have sought to do exactly this task of reclaiming what was once so offensive. It's not a strategy I endorse, but I respect the reasoning behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mermade, that has never been my position.  It is the position of a great many feminists, however, and that was the context in which I was making the remark &#8212; many feminists (Inga Muscio most famously, these days) have sought to do exactly this task of reclaiming what was once so offensive. It&#8217;s not a strategy I endorse, but I respect the reasoning behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45042</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45042</guid>
		<description>There is nothing "loveable" about making racist, sexist insults to a group of black women whose misbehavior consisted of &lt;I&gt;being good as basketball&lt;/I&gt;. There is nothing "curmudgeonly" about Imus's insulting these women. Where I come from, we call that kind of person a bully. 

tranquility et al really excuse Imus because they agree with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing &#8220;loveable&#8221; about making racist, sexist insults to a group of black women whose misbehavior consisted of <i>being good as basketball</i>. There is nothing &#8220;curmudgeonly&#8221; about Imus&#8217;s insulting these women. Where I come from, we call that kind of person a bully. </p>
<p>tranquility et al really excuse Imus because they agree with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mermade</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45036</link>
		<dc:creator>Mermade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-45036</guid>
		<description>"The attempt by some feminists to use words like “bitch” and “cunt” in a positive light only ends up giving misogynists a sense of entitlement to keep on using them..."

Agreed, Hugo. However, I remember you saying in class last year that when feminists use words like "bitch" to describe themsevles, they take away their ability to hurt. If I am misquoting you, by all means correct me. But I seem to recall that fairly well.

I think it does feminists - and all women for that matter - harm to take on words like "bitch" to describe themselves. That is one of the reasons I disliked Melody Berger's book, "We Don't Need Another Wave... Dispatched from the next generation of feminists." Words like "bitch" and "cunt" were used all throughout the book, which I found terribly offensive. Calling yourself a bitch only reinforces the stereotype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The attempt by some feminists to use words like “bitch” and “cunt” in a positive light only ends up giving misogynists a sense of entitlement to keep on using them&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed, Hugo. However, I remember you saying in class last year that when feminists use words like &#8220;bitch&#8221; to describe themsevles, they take away their ability to hurt. If I am misquoting you, by all means correct me. But I seem to recall that fairly well.</p>
<p>I think it does feminists - and all women for that matter - harm to take on words like &#8220;bitch&#8221; to describe themselves. That is one of the reasons I disliked Melody Berger&#8217;s book, &#8220;We Don&#8217;t Need Another Wave&#8230; Dispatched from the next generation of feminists.&#8221; Words like &#8220;bitch&#8221; and &#8220;cunt&#8221; were used all throughout the book, which I found terribly offensive. Calling yourself a bitch only reinforces the stereotype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Gazis-Sax</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44925</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Gazis-Sax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44925</guid>
		<description>And your comments, tranquillity, are all the worse because everyone actually associated with the Rutgers women's basketball team has been pretty darn restrained and dignified in their response to this incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And your comments, tranquillity, are all the worse because everyone actually associated with the Rutgers women&#8217;s basketball team has been pretty darn restrained and dignified in their response to this incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Gazis-Sax</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44920</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Gazis-Sax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44920</guid>
		<description>tranqulity, you appall me.  Here's a group of young women about whom you know &lt;em&gt;nothing&lt;/em&gt;, other than the fact that they're black, good at basketball, and going to a well regarded university.  And you've just claimed that they never read, because, you know, all their brains are capable of is basketball and rap, and that certainly none of them will be doctors and lawyers in ten years time - because what?  Because black students who go to good colleges never then go on to make something of their educations?  Or, what exactly have these women possibly done to make you insult their intelligence like that?  

As for the whole business about athletes being expected to "suck it up," and female athletes being delicate and traumatized if they don't, take that and stuff it.  You go tell any famous male athlete, to his face, that he's a gay prostitute, and then report back on whether he laughs it off or whether he's angry at you.  I haven't noticed that male doctors and lawyers consider themselves obliged to keep their mouths shut when insulted either.  And somehow, we all know that it's possible for them to be legitimately angry when offended, without being presumed to be "traumatized" and incapable of coping with the big, mean world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tranqulity, you appall me.  Here&#8217;s a group of young women about whom you know <em>nothing</em>, other than the fact that they&#8217;re black, good at basketball, and going to a well regarded university.  And you&#8217;ve just claimed that they never read, because, you know, all their brains are capable of is basketball and rap, and that certainly none of them will be doctors and lawyers in ten years time - because what?  Because black students who go to good colleges never then go on to make something of their educations?  Or, what exactly have these women possibly done to make you insult their intelligence like that?  </p>
<p>As for the whole business about athletes being expected to &#8220;suck it up,&#8221; and female athletes being delicate and traumatized if they don&#8217;t, take that and stuff it.  You go tell any famous male athlete, to his face, that he&#8217;s a gay prostitute, and then report back on whether he laughs it off or whether he&#8217;s angry at you.  I haven&#8217;t noticed that male doctors and lawyers consider themselves obliged to keep their mouths shut when insulted either.  And somehow, we all know that it&#8217;s possible for them to be legitimately angry when offended, without being presumed to be &#8220;traumatized&#8221; and incapable of coping with the big, mean world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tranquillity</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44759</link>
		<dc:creator>tranquillity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44759</guid>
		<description>I find this Imus controversy quite ridiculous.  I think Bill Maher had it right when he said something to the effect of we need something to be outraged about.  It was a slow news week and this just happened to catch America's attention.

Everyone knows Mr. Imus is a loveable curmudgeon .  His show would not be simulcast  if the nation did not love and respect his work.  One mistake should not erase what Mr. Ismus has accomplished over the years.  His show was an oasis for the intelligencia of this country.  Hopefully he will live long and prosper on satelitte radio.  

The Rutgers coach was right--it is a green issue--unfortunately advertisers ran scared when this became an issue and the show lost advertisers.  They did not have the courage to stand behind an intelligent and articulate man.  But the coach and the girls from Rutgers now have the chance to cash in on the green too--money deals and media attention from their 15 minutes of fame.  Let's not forget these girls did not even know about this controversy--they had to be told by others.  Perhaps they were sooo busy with studies  (i.e. playing basketball) they did not have time to read .  

According to media reports, this incident and the statements made by Mr. Imus,  traumatized these girls.  Are these girls traumatized by the music of the black rappers?  I bet not!  I am willing to guess these same athletes dance to this music and buy the CD's and think nothing of it.  

It is a tough life out there ladies, and if you are tramatized by this event, you are not going to make it as doctors and lawyers and whatever else you  have dreams of becomming.  Get tough and get on with your lives.  As an athlete you expected to  'suck it up'.

This will all play out as it should.  Mr. Imus will continue to speak out and comment on the things of life.  The Rutgers girls and thier coach will fade away.  Rappers will continue to make outlandish music and black girls will continur to dance their hearts to the rhythms an take no exception to the lyrics.   And oh yeah, let's check back in ten years and see where those Rutgers girls are--if they have really become lawyers, surgeons, etc or  if ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this Imus controversy quite ridiculous.  I think Bill Maher had it right when he said something to the effect of we need something to be outraged about.  It was a slow news week and this just happened to catch America&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>Everyone knows Mr. Imus is a loveable curmudgeon .  His show would not be simulcast  if the nation did not love and respect his work.  One mistake should not erase what Mr. Ismus has accomplished over the years.  His show was an oasis for the intelligencia of this country.  Hopefully he will live long and prosper on satelitte radio.  </p>
<p>The Rutgers coach was right&#8211;it is a green issue&#8211;unfortunately advertisers ran scared when this became an issue and the show lost advertisers.  They did not have the courage to stand behind an intelligent and articulate man.  But the coach and the girls from Rutgers now have the chance to cash in on the green too&#8211;money deals and media attention from their 15 minutes of fame.  Let&#8217;s not forget these girls did not even know about this controversy&#8211;they had to be told by others.  Perhaps they were sooo busy with studies  (i.e. playing basketball) they did not have time to read .  </p>
<p>According to media reports, this incident and the statements made by Mr. Imus,  traumatized these girls.  Are these girls traumatized by the music of the black rappers?  I bet not!  I am willing to guess these same athletes dance to this music and buy the CD&#8217;s and think nothing of it.  </p>
<p>It is a tough life out there ladies, and if you are tramatized by this event, you are not going to make it as doctors and lawyers and whatever else you  have dreams of becomming.  Get tough and get on with your lives.  As an athlete you expected to  &#8217;suck it up&#8217;.</p>
<p>This will all play out as it should.  Mr. Imus will continue to speak out and comment on the things of life.  The Rutgers girls and thier coach will fade away.  Rappers will continue to make outlandish music and black girls will continur to dance their hearts to the rhythms an take no exception to the lyrics.   And oh yeah, let&#8217;s check back in ten years and see where those Rutgers girls are&#8211;if they have really become lawyers, surgeons, etc or  if &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: history_mom</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44310</link>
		<dc:creator>history_mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44310</guid>
		<description>Shawna is right, it isn't just music, it's our entire popular culture. My most recent shake-my-fists-at-the-screen moment was the new Quiznos commercial in which they had some ditz proclaiming that "real women love a big meat sub"- a lovely combination of misogyny and homophobia in one annoying package. I wasn't a big fan of their food, but being so close to my house they got a fair bit of my business. Not anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawna is right, it isn&#8217;t just music, it&#8217;s our entire popular culture. My most recent shake-my-fists-at-the-screen moment was the new Quiznos commercial in which they had some ditz proclaiming that &#8220;real women love a big meat sub&#8221;- a lovely combination of misogyny and homophobia in one annoying package. I wasn&#8217;t a big fan of their food, but being so close to my house they got a fair bit of my business. Not anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44200</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/04/11/a-note-on-language-misogyny-and-don-imus/#comment-44200</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And if you’ve never done it, consider going to support your local college women’s basketball team next year. At most levels, it’s more entertaining than the men’s game (and I’ve watched a hell of a lot of hoops in my day).&lt;/i&gt;

Donna Orender president of the WNBA had a similar sentiment:

"For 10 years, the WNBA has celebrated the grace, beauty, power, achievement and strength of women's basketball," Orender said. "This year, when those fans buy tickets and come to the games, they will be saying to Don Imus that he got this whole thing very, very wrong."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And if you’ve never done it, consider going to support your local college women’s basketball team next year. At most levels, it’s more entertaining than the men’s game (and I’ve watched a hell of a lot of hoops in my day).</i></p>
<p>Donna Orender president of the WNBA had a similar sentiment:</p>
<p>&#8220;For 10 years, the WNBA has celebrated the grace, beauty, power, achievement and strength of women&#8217;s basketball,&#8221; Orender said. &#8220;This year, when those fans buy tickets and come to the games, they will be saying to Don Imus that he got this whole thing very, very wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
