Comments on: Tuesday Search terms http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/ Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:15:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Charlotte http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/#comment-67603 Charlotte Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:07:14 +0000 http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/#comment-67603 Will we ever know, though? Perhaps the seeker needed an outlet for displacing his or her sexuality onto Judeo-Christianity. What would have happened if s/he'd chosen buddhism, I wonder? And no, I'm not going into detail here. Will we ever know, though? Perhaps the seeker needed an outlet for displacing his or her sexuality onto Judeo-Christianity. What would have happened if s/he’d chosen buddhism, I wonder?

And no, I’m not going into detail here.

]]> By: Hugo Schwyzer http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/#comment-67582 Hugo Schwyzer Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:57:54 +0000 http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/#comment-67582 I agree -- I just liked the way it looked... (the phrase, not the morphed genitalia). I agree — I just liked the way it looked… (the phrase, not the morphed genitalia).

]]> By: dave http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/#comment-67580 dave Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:50:41 +0000 http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/06/12/tuesday-search-terms/#comment-67580 <i>morphed genitles</i> Hugo... i am thinking the "genitles" was a misspelling of "genital", not "Gentile," though I am not sure if that makes it better or worse. morphed genitles

Hugo… i am thinking the “genitles” was a misspelling of “genital”, not “Gentile,” though I am not sure if that makes it better or worse.

]]>