<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Times on meat and dating</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rainbow</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-99342</link>
		<dc:creator>rainbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-99342</guid>
		<description>I bet a lot of women reading were fantasizing about eating and enjoy a nice juicy steak rather than picking on a piece of tasteless fish or salad just to impress their date that they try to be healthy and that they probably won't blow up after marriage.  Don't think that women especially here in New York City aren't aware of the impression every morsel of food makes on boyfriends/employers/husbands.  Many only eat in private or in front of girlfriends.  They are never "hungry" in front of the men in their lives.  This article gave them a different approach, or at least the opportunity to contemplate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet a lot of women reading were fantasizing about eating and enjoy a nice juicy steak rather than picking on a piece of tasteless fish or salad just to impress their date that they try to be healthy and that they probably won&#8217;t blow up after marriage.  Don&#8217;t think that women especially here in New York City aren&#8217;t aware of the impression every morsel of food makes on boyfriends/employers/husbands.  Many only eat in private or in front of girlfriends.  They are never &#8220;hungry&#8221; in front of the men in their lives.  This article gave them a different approach, or at least the opportunity to contemplate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leapfrog</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98783</link>
		<dc:creator>leapfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98783</guid>
		<description>This aricle was also refered to in the British Times today - just a couple of inches along with a report of meat sales going up in NY restaurants. Could this be a case of sponsorship by the meat industry? the whole thing seems so absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This aricle was also refered to in the British Times today - just a couple of inches along with a report of meat sales going up in NY restaurants. Could this be a case of sponsorship by the meat industry? the whole thing seems so absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tygirwulf</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98098</link>
		<dc:creator>tygirwulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98098</guid>
		<description>As for meat, I've been eating less and less of it over the years.  The likes of the Jungle and Fast Food Nation are excellent appetite suppressors where meat is concerned.  While I do think humans are supposed to eat meat (why else would it taste good to us?) I object to factory-farming.  I was shocked to learn about it.  Where I grew up, cows graze in big ole pastures and are often butchered and sold locally.  They taste better that way, too.  Now that I live in a city, I abstain from meat often.  To me, it's not self-denial and hardly neurotic to just not pay for poor meat and instead settle on salads or roast veggies for my meal.

What is neurotic eating behavior is to drink a cup of coffee as your meal of the day, and say you feel guilty about eating anything else, and also feel guilty about even watching someone else eat.  Whatever the reasons, that to me says there are some deep-seated issues going on, and it's probably best not to get romantically involved with such a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for meat, I&#8217;ve been eating less and less of it over the years.  The likes of the Jungle and Fast Food Nation are excellent appetite suppressors where meat is concerned.  While I do think humans are supposed to eat meat (why else would it taste good to us?) I object to factory-farming.  I was shocked to learn about it.  Where I grew up, cows graze in big ole pastures and are often butchered and sold locally.  They taste better that way, too.  Now that I live in a city, I abstain from meat often.  To me, it&#8217;s not self-denial and hardly neurotic to just not pay for poor meat and instead settle on salads or roast veggies for my meal.</p>
<p>What is neurotic eating behavior is to drink a cup of coffee as your meal of the day, and say you feel guilty about eating anything else, and also feel guilty about even watching someone else eat.  Whatever the reasons, that to me says there are some deep-seated issues going on, and it&#8217;s probably best not to get romantically involved with such a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tygirwulf</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98092</link>
		<dc:creator>tygirwulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98092</guid>
		<description>Not that I have to worry about it anymore, but the idea of someone weighing me before a date is utterly ridiculous.  To me that's a sure sign that person isn't worth my time.  You're either physically attracted to me or you're not.  Why should a scale reading change that? I know it's easier to make judgments based only on numbers and what they eat on a date, but that's exactly why I don't like it.  People are not always as easy to categorize as they may appear at first glance.  Why is how we look so overwhelmingly important, anyway?  So many women (and I see this happening with young men, too) seem to be slaves to what other people think of how they appear.  I know the fashion, cosmetics, and plastic surgery industries are loving it, though.  Throw more money at them!

As long as your clothes are clean, you're clean, and you have a good attitude, why does it matter that wear size 2s or size 12s?  Or that you buy your clothes from Goodwill or off the racks at Macy's?  I've worn basically the same kinds of clothes since early high school.  I not very fashionable, I will readily admit that.  But I want people to know me for my mind more than what I wear, or eat.  If I have to look a certain way or eat a certain way for someone to listen to me, then I will just find someone else to talk to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I have to worry about it anymore, but the idea of someone weighing me before a date is utterly ridiculous.  To me that&#8217;s a sure sign that person isn&#8217;t worth my time.  You&#8217;re either physically attracted to me or you&#8217;re not.  Why should a scale reading change that? I know it&#8217;s easier to make judgments based only on numbers and what they eat on a date, but that&#8217;s exactly why I don&#8217;t like it.  People are not always as easy to categorize as they may appear at first glance.  Why is how we look so overwhelmingly important, anyway?  So many women (and I see this happening with young men, too) seem to be slaves to what other people think of how they appear.  I know the fashion, cosmetics, and plastic surgery industries are loving it, though.  Throw more money at them!</p>
<p>As long as your clothes are clean, you&#8217;re clean, and you have a good attitude, why does it matter that wear size 2s or size 12s?  Or that you buy your clothes from Goodwill or off the racks at Macy&#8217;s?  I&#8217;ve worn basically the same kinds of clothes since early high school.  I not very fashionable, I will readily admit that.  But I want people to know me for my mind more than what I wear, or eat.  If I have to look a certain way or eat a certain way for someone to listen to me, then I will just find someone else to talk to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leapfrog</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98088</link>
		<dc:creator>leapfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98088</guid>
		<description>Mr. Bad it was just a bit of humour in response to your very definite weight criteria of 100 to 150 pounds per date - not a serious comment. 

I find it very odd that anyone thinks this much about what they or their date eats early on in a relationship and find it hard to believe that they actually do. Surely this article is silly season column inch filling material - no  woman or man I know would give a flying hoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Bad it was just a bit of humour in response to your very definite weight criteria of 100 to 150 pounds per date - not a serious comment. </p>
<p>I find it very odd that anyone thinks this much about what they or their date eats early on in a relationship and find it hard to believe that they actually do. Surely this article is silly season column inch filling material - no  woman or man I know would give a flying hoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bad</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98064</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-98064</guid>
		<description>leapfrog said: &lt;i&gt;"I’m also intrigued by the possibity that some American men insist on weighing women before they’ll go on a date with them."&lt;/i&gt;

Personally I've never known any man to do this, let alone even heard of such a thing.  leapfrog, do you have real, verifiable proof that this actually occurs or is another urban myth going around in feminist circles?

As for the whole 'meat vs. veggie/vegan' thing, I think what this represents is more of a 'I'm-not-a-self-obsessed neurotic' reaction to the stereotypes presented in women's magazines, etc.  Which by the way, are written by and for women, so trying to link it to men, 'the patriarchy,' etc., is nothing short of ridiculous.  Unless of course you want to suggest that Oprah et al. are 'misogynist tools of the patriarchy' or other such nonsense. 

 clean up your own house and stop trying to blame this stuff on men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leapfrog said: <i>&#8220;I’m also intrigued by the possibity that some American men insist on weighing women before they’ll go on a date with them.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;ve never known any man to do this, let alone even heard of such a thing.  leapfrog, do you have real, verifiable proof that this actually occurs or is another urban myth going around in feminist circles?</p>
<p>As for the whole &#8216;meat vs. veggie/vegan&#8217; thing, I think what this represents is more of a &#8216;I&#8217;m-not-a-self-obsessed neurotic&#8217; reaction to the stereotypes presented in women&#8217;s magazines, etc.  Which by the way, are written by and for women, so trying to link it to men, &#8216;the patriarchy,&#8217; etc., is nothing short of ridiculous.  Unless of course you want to suggest that Oprah et al. are &#8216;misogynist tools of the patriarchy&#8217; or other such nonsense. </p>
<p> clean up your own house and stop trying to blame this stuff on men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leapfrog</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-97955</link>
		<dc:creator>leapfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-97955</guid>
		<description>btw I'm also intrigued by the possibity that some American men insist on weighing women before they'll go on a date with them. Is this some kind of outdated patriachal founding father's thing??, I don't know, boats etc but yes Hugo we shouldn't feed these people (Mr Bad etc I mean and no pun intended) so will understand if you delete this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw I&#8217;m also intrigued by the possibity that some American men insist on weighing women before they&#8217;ll go on a date with them. Is this some kind of outdated patriachal founding father&#8217;s thing??, I don&#8217;t know, boats etc but yes Hugo we shouldn&#8217;t feed these people (Mr Bad etc I mean and no pun intended) so will understand if you delete this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leapfrog</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-97945</link>
		<dc:creator>leapfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-97945</guid>
		<description>How unbelievable that this sort of thing gets printed in the New York Times!!!!! It reminds me of the kind of article you used to find in the first girl's teen magazines in the early 80s (before they developed any self consciousness). 
They must have been really desperate to fill column inches. 

Does any real people actually consider this sort of thing on a date?? I mean surely the only extra criteria one would have when choosing food for a date would be potential for embarrassment, ie maybe you'd avoid a messy spagetti sauce etc

Really - is there nothing happening in America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How unbelievable that this sort of thing gets printed in the New York Times!!!!! It reminds me of the kind of article you used to find in the first girl&#8217;s teen magazines in the early 80s (before they developed any self consciousness).<br />
They must have been really desperate to fill column inches. </p>
<p>Does any real people actually consider this sort of thing on a date?? I mean surely the only extra criteria one would have when choosing food for a date would be potential for embarrassment, ie maybe you&#8217;d avoid a messy spagetti sauce etc</p>
<p>Really - is there nothing happening in America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-96845</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-96845</guid>
		<description>OK, to get back on topic...Hugo, you probably won't find anyone who summed this whole thing up better than Rebecca Traister at Salon:

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/08/09/red_meat/index.html

I don't agree with everything she writes, but this assessment is, I think, spot-on. The whole article is sexist as hell because what it really boils down to is women choosing what to eat on a date as "strategy" for "catching a man." It does us as a gender no good to trade the presumably sanctimonious salad for a lusty chunk of steak if, in the end, the bottom line is choosing to eat something based on the impression we think it will make on the man we are with. (Especially if what we eat will only be seen as a positive reflection upon us if we are able to eat it while remaining effortlessly thin, because to be un-thin is to fail at pleasing the man.)

You have every right as a vegan to be offended at the assumptions made in this article about people who eat meat vs. people who don't, with those who don't characterized as wimpy, weak and neurotic, and with the assumption that men are all meat-eaters who want a woman who is one, too. But as a woman, what offends me far more is that I have been handed yet another piece of "trend journalism" that adds to the drip, drip, drip of stories out there that confirm for me that women haven't come all that far in the past few decades...that if anything we've had a setback...because now it's OK for us to eat meat on a date, but why? Only because it will, supposedly, make men think we are tigers in bed who can't wait to rip off our clothes and ravish them.

If we are thin, the thought of this will thrill them to death...but, if we're not, it will terrify the crap out of them.

Once again, it's all about what men want...much like the sexual revolution of the 1960s, which was supposedly about freeing both men and women to follow their sexual appetites without shame, but proved to suit men more than it did most women. How many women feel pushed into having sex with a man during that era, when when they didn't want to, because they were afraid of appearing "uptight" and "repressed" and "frigid"?

I only hope this doesn't start a trend of women downing meat on dates whether they want to or not, just because they're afraid of appearing "weak" if the idea of a juicy steak doesn't turn them on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, to get back on topic&#8230;Hugo, you probably won&#8217;t find anyone who summed this whole thing up better than Rebecca Traister at Salon:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/08/09/red_meat/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/08/09/red_meat/index.html</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with everything she writes, but this assessment is, I think, spot-on. The whole article is sexist as hell because what it really boils down to is women choosing what to eat on a date as &#8220;strategy&#8221; for &#8220;catching a man.&#8221; It does us as a gender no good to trade the presumably sanctimonious salad for a lusty chunk of steak if, in the end, the bottom line is choosing to eat something based on the impression we think it will make on the man we are with. (Especially if what we eat will only be seen as a positive reflection upon us if we are able to eat it while remaining effortlessly thin, because to be un-thin is to fail at pleasing the man.)</p>
<p>You have every right as a vegan to be offended at the assumptions made in this article about people who eat meat vs. people who don&#8217;t, with those who don&#8217;t characterized as wimpy, weak and neurotic, and with the assumption that men are all meat-eaters who want a woman who is one, too. But as a woman, what offends me far more is that I have been handed yet another piece of &#8220;trend journalism&#8221; that adds to the drip, drip, drip of stories out there that confirm for me that women haven&#8217;t come all that far in the past few decades&#8230;that if anything we&#8217;ve had a setback&#8230;because now it&#8217;s OK for us to eat meat on a date, but why? Only because it will, supposedly, make men think we are tigers in bed who can&#8217;t wait to rip off our clothes and ravish them.</p>
<p>If we are thin, the thought of this will thrill them to death&#8230;but, if we&#8217;re not, it will terrify the crap out of them.</p>
<p>Once again, it&#8217;s all about what men want&#8230;much like the sexual revolution of the 1960s, which was supposedly about freeing both men and women to follow their sexual appetites without shame, but proved to suit men more than it did most women. How many women feel pushed into having sex with a man during that era, when when they didn&#8217;t want to, because they were afraid of appearing &#8220;uptight&#8221; and &#8220;repressed&#8221; and &#8220;frigid&#8221;?</p>
<p>I only hope this doesn&#8217;t start a trend of women downing meat on dates whether they want to or not, just because they&#8217;re afraid of appearing &#8220;weak&#8221; if the idea of a juicy steak doesn&#8217;t turn them on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-96258</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/08/09/the-times-on-meat-and-dating/#comment-96258</guid>
		<description>OK. But just one more thing...I have yet to see a 230-pound woman who "looks like big, badass male football players." Most women, whatever their weight, have hips and breasts--and many, even heavier ones, have waists whose dimensions are smaller than their hips and breasts. Whether or not a man finds such women personally appealing, they don't really look very much like male football players. Or refrigerators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. But just one more thing&#8230;I have yet to see a 230-pound woman who &#8220;looks like big, badass male football players.&#8221; Most women, whatever their weight, have hips and breasts&#8211;and many, even heavier ones, have waists whose dimensions are smaller than their hips and breasts. Whether or not a man finds such women personally appealing, they don&#8217;t really look very much like male football players. Or refrigerators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
