<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Girlfriends, boyfriends, feminism: a long response to &#8220;Gwynn&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-372106</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-372106</guid>
		<description>I agree with B's points. Being more specific rather than general tends to help focus communication and therefore is usually a more effective tool. Offering examples can be helpful too. It's infuriating when people make sweeping generalizations or offer cliches, although most of us are occasionally guilty of doing so. I tune people out all the time and I usually do so when I feel that the other person is doing all the talking, or I feel that they are not interested in what I have to say. They may say that they are interested in what I have to say, but there responses clearly indicate otherwise. I can't emphasize this enough...their responses to me, generally informs me of whether or not they are listening. Communication is a two-way street, but with some people it can all too often feel like it is all about them. If I don't feel included I may be polite, depending on the situation, but usually I'll tune them out and if they don't take the hint, I'll try to find a way to avoid them. I'm not saying you do this, but getting someone to participate is sometimes as simple as learning when to listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with B&#8217;s points. Being more specific rather than general tends to help focus communication and therefore is usually a more effective tool. Offering examples can be helpful too. It&#8217;s infuriating when people make sweeping generalizations or offer cliches, although most of us are occasionally guilty of doing so. I tune people out all the time and I usually do so when I feel that the other person is doing all the talking, or I feel that they are not interested in what I have to say. They may say that they are interested in what I have to say, but there responses clearly indicate otherwise. I can&#8217;t emphasize this enough&#8230;their responses to me, generally informs me of whether or not they are listening. Communication is a two-way street, but with some people it can all too often feel like it is all about them. If I don&#8217;t feel included I may be polite, depending on the situation, but usually I&#8217;ll tune them out and if they don&#8217;t take the hint, I&#8217;ll try to find a way to avoid them. I&#8217;m not saying you do this, but getting someone to participate is sometimes as simple as learning when to listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-370113</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-370113</guid>
		<description>whatsername - 

If the generic nature of your conversations is what is turning him off, it sounds like you just need to be more specific. I can understand his dislike of your pronouns - saying "they" this and "they" that DOES sound conspiracy-like, it doesn't really point to anything tangible ("they" who? it's not like there is a literal Grand Council on Patriarchy making the rules). 

If your goal is to become a women's studies professor, you might ask him to help you figure out how to help him relate to your theories - because that's what you'll need to do in the classroom, too. Telling your students all about the "oppression" that "they" are subjecting women to is just going to leave them confused. If you approach it from that angle, he may open up to responding to you when you wax theoretical rather than tuning you out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatsername - </p>
<p>If the generic nature of your conversations is what is turning him off, it sounds like you just need to be more specific. I can understand his dislike of your pronouns - saying &#8220;they&#8221; this and &#8220;they&#8221; that DOES sound conspiracy-like, it doesn&#8217;t really point to anything tangible (&#8221;they&#8221; who? it&#8217;s not like there is a literal Grand Council on Patriarchy making the rules). </p>
<p>If your goal is to become a women&#8217;s studies professor, you might ask him to help you figure out how to help him relate to your theories - because that&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll need to do in the classroom, too. Telling your students all about the &#8220;oppression&#8221; that &#8220;they&#8221; are subjecting women to is just going to leave them confused. If you approach it from that angle, he may open up to responding to you when you wax theoretical rather than tuning you out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsername</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-369515</link>
		<dc:creator>whatsername</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-369515</guid>
		<description>Fortunately my husband does not even remotely make a leap like that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately my husband does not even remotely make a leap like that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamSeaborn</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-369094</link>
		<dc:creator>SamSeaborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-369094</guid>
		<description>Wahtsername,

I was born in a country with a genocidal past and occasionally harassed because of it. In the beginning that felt horrible and I was very defensive. But eventually I learned to live with it because I did not have anything to do with that, so I did not care. I wasn't guilty. 

But feminism has constructed an all-pervasive system without individual guilt that still allows to shift blame around based on group membership: patriarchy. I've suffered from feminist indoctrination in my personal development and I can tell you that the broad strokes of badly understood sociology can be quite intimidating and infuriating to a young person that is being accused of being guilty without having done anything. 

Thus, short of a sex change your husband will always be an "oppressor" in feminist ideology whether or not you earn the money, whether or not you're the only one taking liberties in your relationship, whether or not he already lives your theories.

See, I occasionally feel defensive and infuriated simply because Hugo has written something about how bad men are and I somehow interpret it as a personal attack and react accordingly - because I am a man (who cares, although I should probably be one who doesn't, it's a lot healthier). And this a just a blog.

As I mentioned above I haven't had a girlfrind who self-identified as feminist, but I've had a few infuriating discussions with feminist friends that led to extended no-speaking periods. I certainly couldn't live with a person who'd see me as a member of an "oppressor class" however much she'd tell me I was different, and if she'd stand by the theory, well, then I'd probably be wrong for her, and she'd be wrong for me. Other people have other incompatibilities. For me, some political is personal, too.

This is a loose-loose setup, in my opinion. But there was a post a while ago on feministe about how to have a "feminist relationship" and how to be a "feminist boyfriend". You may  want to check there for some advice. Some "feminist" relationships apparently exist. Please note that when I say feminist I mean relationships in which both parts accept "male oppression" and a specific defitiniton of "patriarchy" as an integral part of their relationship, not simply "gender justice" and equality, which is something everyone should be interested in.

Btw, if you say "but you're not like them" my next mental step would be "so I'm not a real man for you?"...

Just my 2 ct., good luck to you two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wahtsername,</p>
<p>I was born in a country with a genocidal past and occasionally harassed because of it. In the beginning that felt horrible and I was very defensive. But eventually I learned to live with it because I did not have anything to do with that, so I did not care. I wasn&#8217;t guilty. </p>
<p>But feminism has constructed an all-pervasive system without individual guilt that still allows to shift blame around based on group membership: patriarchy. I&#8217;ve suffered from feminist indoctrination in my personal development and I can tell you that the broad strokes of badly understood sociology can be quite intimidating and infuriating to a young person that is being accused of being guilty without having done anything. </p>
<p>Thus, short of a sex change your husband will always be an &#8220;oppressor&#8221; in feminist ideology whether or not you earn the money, whether or not you&#8217;re the only one taking liberties in your relationship, whether or not he already lives your theories.</p>
<p>See, I occasionally feel defensive and infuriated simply because Hugo has written something about how bad men are and I somehow interpret it as a personal attack and react accordingly - because I am a man (who cares, although I should probably be one who doesn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s a lot healthier). And this a just a blog.</p>
<p>As I mentioned above I haven&#8217;t had a girlfrind who self-identified as feminist, but I&#8217;ve had a few infuriating discussions with feminist friends that led to extended no-speaking periods. I certainly couldn&#8217;t live with a person who&#8217;d see me as a member of an &#8220;oppressor class&#8221; however much she&#8217;d tell me I was different, and if she&#8217;d stand by the theory, well, then I&#8217;d probably be wrong for her, and she&#8217;d be wrong for me. Other people have other incompatibilities. For me, some political is personal, too.</p>
<p>This is a loose-loose setup, in my opinion. But there was a post a while ago on feministe about how to have a &#8220;feminist relationship&#8221; and how to be a &#8220;feminist boyfriend&#8221;. You may  want to check there for some advice. Some &#8220;feminist&#8221; relationships apparently exist. Please note that when I say feminist I mean relationships in which both parts accept &#8220;male oppression&#8221; and a specific defitiniton of &#8220;patriarchy&#8221; as an integral part of their relationship, not simply &#8220;gender justice&#8221; and equality, which is something everyone should be interested in.</p>
<p>Btw, if you say &#8220;but you&#8217;re not like them&#8221; my next mental step would be &#8220;so I&#8217;m not a real man for you?&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Just my 2 ct., good luck to you two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368952</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368952</guid>
		<description>I admit to having some problems with how the word "privilege" is used in a lot of feminist writings.  Being an armchair historian (my main hobby), I first think of aristocratic privilege when I hear the word "privilege". Aristocratic privilege being special rights granted to the aristocracy by the King. In the legal profession, privilege means confidential communication between client and attorney. Originally, lawyers were granted this special right by the King.

When I read the word "privilege" in feminist writings, it has multiple meanings.  Several of the meanings used contradict each other.  Similar to how cleave means to separate or join together.  I understand why there are two meaning of cleave because they came from two different languages.  I don’t understand the use of contradictory meanings of privilege in feminism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit to having some problems with how the word &#8220;privilege&#8221; is used in a lot of feminist writings.  Being an armchair historian (my main hobby), I first think of aristocratic privilege when I hear the word &#8220;privilege&#8221;. Aristocratic privilege being special rights granted to the aristocracy by the King. In the legal profession, privilege means confidential communication between client and attorney. Originally, lawyers were granted this special right by the King.</p>
<p>When I read the word &#8220;privilege&#8221; in feminist writings, it has multiple meanings.  Several of the meanings used contradict each other.  Similar to how cleave means to separate or join together.  I understand why there are two meaning of cleave because they came from two different languages.  I don’t understand the use of contradictory meanings of privilege in feminism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsername</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368851</link>
		<dc:creator>whatsername</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368851</guid>
		<description>B, yes I have told him that.  I asked him again this morning if he knew he was the most feminist man I know, and he said yes, and then said the thing about all the pronouns I use.  And that the topic was so general.  It seems like he starts tuning out anytime I use words like "oppression" "privilege" "Patriarchy" "they" that sort of thing...  But how do I talk about privilege without using the word? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B, yes I have told him that.  I asked him again this morning if he knew he was the most feminist man I know, and he said yes, and then said the thing about all the pronouns I use.  And that the topic was so general.  It seems like he starts tuning out anytime I use words like &#8220;oppression&#8221; &#8220;privilege&#8221; &#8220;Patriarchy&#8221; &#8220;they&#8221; that sort of thing&#8230;  But how do I talk about privilege without using the word? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsername</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368850</link>
		<dc:creator>whatsername</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368850</guid>
		<description>Last night we were talking about the existence of male privilege.

I talked to him this morning and he says I am too general and use too many pronouns... But I don't know how else to approach it, there's so much involved in how oppression/privilege works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night we were talking about the existence of male privilege.</p>
<p>I talked to him this morning and he says I am too general and use too many pronouns&#8230; But I don&#8217;t know how else to approach it, there&#8217;s so much involved in how oppression/privilege works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368825</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368825</guid>
		<description>I think B asks the question -- and suggests the tack -- I would.  Is it a knee-jerk response to theory itself?  I must admit, I'm famous for rolling my eyes when theory comes up.  Reading Cixous and Irigaray and the rest of 'em was one of the more painful parts of my academic career.  If you could be more specific about the substance of the objection, perhaps we could help more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think B asks the question &#8212; and suggests the tack &#8212; I would.  Is it a knee-jerk response to theory itself?  I must admit, I&#8217;m famous for rolling my eyes when theory comes up.  Reading Cixous and Irigaray and the rest of &#8216;em was one of the more painful parts of my academic career.  If you could be more specific about the substance of the objection, perhaps we could help more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368808</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368808</guid>
		<description>whatsername,

Have you point-blank asked him why he gets so defensive? Have you told him that he's one of the most feminist men you know, and that your "waxing theoretical" isn't meant to be an attack on him? Perhaps letting him know that he's already living your theories will put him at ease, and his answers will help guide you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatsername,</p>
<p>Have you point-blank asked him why he gets so defensive? Have you told him that he&#8217;s one of the most feminist men you know, and that your &#8220;waxing theoretical&#8221; isn&#8217;t meant to be an attack on him? Perhaps letting him know that he&#8217;s already living your theories will put him at ease, and his answers will help guide you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368805</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/04/07/girlfriends-boyfriends-feminism-a-long-response-to-gwynn/#comment-368805</guid>
		<description>whatsername,

"I feel like I do not know how to introduce him to the theoretical side of feminism without getting his back up."

I do not know what the "theoretical side of feminism" is or means.  Most of the things that Hugo and others talk about on this blog are practical: "do this, or don't do that" type of things to be a feminist.

Would you give one or two examples of theoretical feminism that makes your husband feel attacked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatsername,</p>
<p>&#8220;I feel like I do not know how to introduce him to the theoretical side of feminism without getting his back up.&#8221;</p>
<p>I do not know what the &#8220;theoretical side of feminism&#8221; is or means.  Most of the things that Hugo and others talk about on this blog are practical: &#8220;do this, or don&#8217;t do that&#8221; type of things to be a feminist.</p>
<p>Would you give one or two examples of theoretical feminism that makes your husband feel attacked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
