<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Elitism&#8221;, privilege, and competition: some thoughts on the new Deresiewicz article</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-427548</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-427548</guid>
		<description>In reading some of these responses, I agree with Mark, "...that it helps to be a good listener." Sadly, I have met far more people who are NOT "good listerners". 

I also agree with this gem,"Most people are flattered when someone takes a genuine interest in what they have to say." Again, and sadly, I've met few people who take a "genuine interest," in what I have to say and are more interested in what they have to say, projecting, and taking every opportunity to talk about themselves and their opinions.  Perhaps I've met an overabundance of self-absorbed, self-talkers. I've never had to make small talk as I've met people who can't stop talking about themselves and don't stop talking long enough for anyone else to get a word in edgewise. A lot of people focus on the wrong questions and make broad-sweeping generalizations about other human beings and this is definitely off-putting for any future communication. In fact, it's a dealbreaker in most situations. I've observed communication problems and have been exposed to insufferable insecurities and inappropriate commentaries among highly educated people and trades people alike--it's part of the human condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reading some of these responses, I agree with Mark, &#8220;&#8230;that it helps to be a good listener.&#8221; Sadly, I have met far more people who are NOT &#8220;good listerners&#8221;. </p>
<p>I also agree with this gem,&#8221;Most people are flattered when someone takes a genuine interest in what they have to say.&#8221; Again, and sadly, I&#8217;ve met few people who take a &#8220;genuine interest,&#8221; in what I have to say and are more interested in what they have to say, projecting, and taking every opportunity to talk about themselves and their opinions.  Perhaps I&#8217;ve met an overabundance of self-absorbed, self-talkers. I&#8217;ve never had to make small talk as I&#8217;ve met people who can&#8217;t stop talking about themselves and don&#8217;t stop talking long enough for anyone else to get a word in edgewise. A lot of people focus on the wrong questions and make broad-sweeping generalizations about other human beings and this is definitely off-putting for any future communication. In fact, it&#8217;s a dealbreaker in most situations. I&#8217;ve observed communication problems and have been exposed to insufferable insecurities and inappropriate commentaries among highly educated people and trades people alike&#8211;it&#8217;s part of the human condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-427141</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-427141</guid>
		<description>All Deresiewicz has revealed is that he suffers from insecurity and has a communication problem. Communication problems are part of the human condition and abound with higher education types and ordinary people. No one is immune and as far as I’m concerned everyone could use a lot of work in this area.  Also, plumbers are expensive and I’m pressed for time, so I don’t feel it necessary to engage in lengthy small talk…just a polite hello, statement of the problem, the time involved in fixing the problem and the price. 

In regards to academic elitism, I paid for my own schooling and tuition, so I was forced out of practicality and necessity to choose a state school. I didn’t have the luxury of attending an Ivy-league school and never entertained the thought. Instead, I attended two community colleges before transferring to Cal Poly SLO. After I graduated from college I found difficulty obtaining work within my chosen field. Out of necessity (I had to work and earn a living) I was told that a college education didn’t mean anything—a comment usually made by someone interviewing me in personnel or the human resources department. Sadly, I heard this comment all too often. People snooped and intruded into my personal life, asking questions which were none of their business instead of focusing on my talents and abilities. I also observed that they seemed far more preoccupied with my age, marital and especially my reproductive status, which was NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS, yet this was still their focus. I was offered secretarial positions, which didn’t require a college education.  I have met many business people who majored in something entirely different from their current career paths or should I say jobs. I have also met a lot of people who switched careers and many who are overqualified, overeducated and underpaid.  Unfortunately, I’ve encountered a lot of sexual harassment, which has been tolerated and overlooked in corporate settings and I’ve also encountered many people who’ve had their careers derailed and obstructed by ruthless manipulators competing for jobs, status, money, positions, etc. The more ruthless individuals have derailed hardworking employees simply because they are power hungry and usually because they feel threatened or have or had personal issues with someone (meaning that they didn’t like them) and unfortunately exercised undue influence to get people fired, terminated or just make their work life living hell, which forces them out.  I believe connections are far more important in business than actual ability or education and there’s a certain cache to bragging about what college one has attended—at least in some circles. I wish that were not so, but I’ve observed it more than what I would like too. It all comes down to if someone likes you, how insecure they are or if they feel threatened by you. How talented you may simply doesn't matter if the decision maker is insecure or threatened by your talents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Deresiewicz has revealed is that he suffers from insecurity and has a communication problem. Communication problems are part of the human condition and abound with higher education types and ordinary people. No one is immune and as far as I’m concerned everyone could use a lot of work in this area.  Also, plumbers are expensive and I’m pressed for time, so I don’t feel it necessary to engage in lengthy small talk…just a polite hello, statement of the problem, the time involved in fixing the problem and the price. </p>
<p>In regards to academic elitism, I paid for my own schooling and tuition, so I was forced out of practicality and necessity to choose a state school. I didn’t have the luxury of attending an Ivy-league school and never entertained the thought. Instead, I attended two community colleges before transferring to Cal Poly SLO. After I graduated from college I found difficulty obtaining work within my chosen field. Out of necessity (I had to work and earn a living) I was told that a college education didn’t mean anything—a comment usually made by someone interviewing me in personnel or the human resources department. Sadly, I heard this comment all too often. People snooped and intruded into my personal life, asking questions which were none of their business instead of focusing on my talents and abilities. I also observed that they seemed far more preoccupied with my age, marital and especially my reproductive status, which was NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS, yet this was still their focus. I was offered secretarial positions, which didn’t require a college education.  I have met many business people who majored in something entirely different from their current career paths or should I say jobs. I have also met a lot of people who switched careers and many who are overqualified, overeducated and underpaid.  Unfortunately, I’ve encountered a lot of sexual harassment, which has been tolerated and overlooked in corporate settings and I’ve also encountered many people who’ve had their careers derailed and obstructed by ruthless manipulators competing for jobs, status, money, positions, etc. The more ruthless individuals have derailed hardworking employees simply because they are power hungry and usually because they feel threatened or have or had personal issues with someone (meaning that they didn’t like them) and unfortunately exercised undue influence to get people fired, terminated or just make their work life living hell, which forces them out.  I believe connections are far more important in business than actual ability or education and there’s a certain cache to bragging about what college one has attended—at least in some circles. I wish that were not so, but I’ve observed it more than what I would like too. It all comes down to if someone likes you, how insecure they are or if they feel threatened by you. How talented you may simply doesn&#8217;t matter if the decision maker is insecure or threatened by your talents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424856</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424856</guid>
		<description>As a person who comes from the working class and has educated herself with a liberal arts college education, I can see both sides of the issue.  I grew up in Texas, and have traveled substantially.  I am also about to move over to Europe to marry and live there hopefully for the rest of my life.

After all the travel and education, I found it hard to go back to Texas.  It was not that I could not make small talk - I have waited enough tables in my life to be able to do that with anyone, just that I find it difficult to find common ground to connect with a lot of people from where I come from.  I felt like a foreigner in my own hometown.

Small talk is different than talking.  You can always talk about the weather, sports, price of gas/food, for a few minutes.  But on any substantial level, my feelings on many of the larger issues in life can be very different than the people from where I came from.  

This is not something that I have a problem with, but something I accept. It was better when I moved out to the east coast and found loads of people like me.  I don't know if this smacks of elitism or not.  I surely don't consider myself elite as I don't have a fantastic financial situation.

Socialist, yes, athiest, yes, feminist, yes... if that makes me elite, than so be it. 

I also love good cheese.  :)

But I don't think it is necessarily just a product of an ivy league education.  It is a combination of class and experience.  I guess because I am from working class I can at least attempt to blend in and talk to the plebes.  I have never been OKOP, and who knows if marrying European and living that life will make me that.  But I don't think it is something you can become, only something that you are born into. Maybe I'll always feel like a fraud, but I am pretty happy being the open minded Texan in France.   

This is obviously an issue that I have not yet resolved within myself.  Someday I would love to write a great essay, but first the inner conflict must be clarified.  The struggle between where I came from and where I aspire to be.  

The problem with Deresiewicz's statement is that he seems to be saying that he cannot connect even on the most basic human level.  And that is something that everyone should be able to do with everyone.  Especially if they are OKOP.  All the OKOP that I have met have pretty decent social skills.  For example, my current boss is the CEO of an association in DC.  I admire her completely because she treats everyone as humans, from the person who waters the plants in our office to the ambassador of France.  And that is what a good and decent person should be able to do, in my opinion.  So, if she is OKOP, then count me in.  That is what I want to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a person who comes from the working class and has educated herself with a liberal arts college education, I can see both sides of the issue.  I grew up in Texas, and have traveled substantially.  I am also about to move over to Europe to marry and live there hopefully for the rest of my life.</p>
<p>After all the travel and education, I found it hard to go back to Texas.  It was not that I could not make small talk - I have waited enough tables in my life to be able to do that with anyone, just that I find it difficult to find common ground to connect with a lot of people from where I come from.  I felt like a foreigner in my own hometown.</p>
<p>Small talk is different than talking.  You can always talk about the weather, sports, price of gas/food, for a few minutes.  But on any substantial level, my feelings on many of the larger issues in life can be very different than the people from where I came from.  </p>
<p>This is not something that I have a problem with, but something I accept. It was better when I moved out to the east coast and found loads of people like me.  I don&#8217;t know if this smacks of elitism or not.  I surely don&#8217;t consider myself elite as I don&#8217;t have a fantastic financial situation.</p>
<p>Socialist, yes, athiest, yes, feminist, yes&#8230; if that makes me elite, than so be it. </p>
<p>I also love good cheese.  :)</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think it is necessarily just a product of an ivy league education.  It is a combination of class and experience.  I guess because I am from working class I can at least attempt to blend in and talk to the plebes.  I have never been OKOP, and who knows if marrying European and living that life will make me that.  But I don&#8217;t think it is something you can become, only something that you are born into. Maybe I&#8217;ll always feel like a fraud, but I am pretty happy being the open minded Texan in France.   </p>
<p>This is obviously an issue that I have not yet resolved within myself.  Someday I would love to write a great essay, but first the inner conflict must be clarified.  The struggle between where I came from and where I aspire to be.  </p>
<p>The problem with Deresiewicz&#8217;s statement is that he seems to be saying that he cannot connect even on the most basic human level.  And that is something that everyone should be able to do with everyone.  Especially if they are OKOP.  All the OKOP that I have met have pretty decent social skills.  For example, my current boss is the CEO of an association in DC.  I admire her completely because she treats everyone as humans, from the person who waters the plants in our office to the ambassador of France.  And that is what a good and decent person should be able to do, in my opinion.  So, if she is OKOP, then count me in.  That is what I want to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424699</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424699</guid>
		<description>Robert, I'm not denying that.  I am suggesting that there is a big difference between "interacting" with people and "engaging" with them.  Much of that engagement only comes through more intimate experience.

In the same vein, not every out-of-touch elitist fails to engage with and see working people clearly by discounting them.  Indeed, many artificially distort and mythologize the experiences of everyday people, usually arising from oversubscribing to either academic or pop-culture perspectives  about "how the other half lives".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I&#8217;m not denying that.  I am suggesting that there is a big difference between &#8220;interacting&#8221; with people and &#8220;engaging&#8221; with them.  Much of that engagement only comes through more intimate experience.</p>
<p>In the same vein, not every out-of-touch elitist fails to engage with and see working people clearly by discounting them.  Indeed, many artificially distort and mythologize the experiences of everyday people, usually arising from oversubscribing to either academic or pop-culture perspectives  about &#8220;how the other half lives&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424596</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424596</guid>
		<description>Tom -

Every one of those kids has interacted on a near-daily basis with people who work with their hands. Janitors, clerks, sales people, mechanics, food servers, meter maids - it is not possible to reach maturity in Western civilization without having substantial interaction with people from different social classes.

It &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; possible, if you're a hopeless elitist, to bypass all of those conversations and interactions and pretend that all these services are being provided by invisible robots. But they aren't. Everyone is perfectly capable of engaging with "the workers".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom -</p>
<p>Every one of those kids has interacted on a near-daily basis with people who work with their hands. Janitors, clerks, sales people, mechanics, food servers, meter maids - it is not possible to reach maturity in Western civilization without having substantial interaction with people from different social classes.</p>
<p>It <i>is</i> possible, if you&#8217;re a hopeless elitist, to bypass all of those conversations and interactions and pretend that all these services are being provided by invisible robots. But they aren&#8217;t. Everyone is perfectly capable of engaging with &#8220;the workers&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424417</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424417</guid>
		<description>Class in this country today seems more tied to education, or at least culture, than anything else I can determine save maybe family.  What else determines it?  Money?  A lucky and successful real-estate developer or small business person today without a college degree can have as much or more money than many people in the upper or professional classes, live in a gated community, have a half-dozen cars, and still would be regarded in a different class than, say, an Ivy league alum sweating out high five-figures in Manhattan publishing.  If I were to identify what likely determines class in this country, the three biggest variables would be family, education, and familiarity, current or past, with working trades.

The ability to communicate across class of this sort comes from experience.  Those students in the public universities, most transfer students, ones from less-advantaged backgrounds, and so forth have had more exposure, either through family or through their own experience, to different lifestyles.  I saw something of this divide at Cal.  Older students with workplace experience, transfer students, veterans, and minority students often had a sort of inter-cultural fluency that 18-to-22 year old white kids right out of good high schools lacked.  If those latter students then went on to grad school and a professorship at an elite school, or maybe into a cushy sinecure obtained through good family or other connections, and never had a day's experience really sweating out a paycheck, it would be pretty conceivable that, ten years later, they might realize that they've never learned to relate to a plumber or anyone else who works with their hands, and would write similar articles themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class in this country today seems more tied to education, or at least culture, than anything else I can determine save maybe family.  What else determines it?  Money?  A lucky and successful real-estate developer or small business person today without a college degree can have as much or more money than many people in the upper or professional classes, live in a gated community, have a half-dozen cars, and still would be regarded in a different class than, say, an Ivy league alum sweating out high five-figures in Manhattan publishing.  If I were to identify what likely determines class in this country, the three biggest variables would be family, education, and familiarity, current or past, with working trades.</p>
<p>The ability to communicate across class of this sort comes from experience.  Those students in the public universities, most transfer students, ones from less-advantaged backgrounds, and so forth have had more exposure, either through family or through their own experience, to different lifestyles.  I saw something of this divide at Cal.  Older students with workplace experience, transfer students, veterans, and minority students often had a sort of inter-cultural fluency that 18-to-22 year old white kids right out of good high schools lacked.  If those latter students then went on to grad school and a professorship at an elite school, or maybe into a cushy sinecure obtained through good family or other connections, and never had a day&#8217;s experience really sweating out a paycheck, it would be pretty conceivable that, ten years later, they might realize that they&#8217;ve never learned to relate to a plumber or anyone else who works with their hands, and would write similar articles themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424313</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424313</guid>
		<description>If you cannot talk to every one of your fellow human beings - the occasional psychopathically unsociable person aside - then there is something fundamentally wrong with you. Not your education, your heart. We're all human beings, and the majority of our daily experience is in common. We all love, hate, fear, rejoice, mourn, laugh - all of this we have in common. The author is in love with his own preciousness and specialness, and unwilling to engage with his fellow because he thinks it will bring him down. He's just a stuck-up ass, not an exemplar of some Deep and Meaningful Cultural Divide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you cannot talk to every one of your fellow human beings - the occasional psychopathically unsociable person aside - then there is something fundamentally wrong with you. Not your education, your heart. We&#8217;re all human beings, and the majority of our daily experience is in common. We all love, hate, fear, rejoice, mourn, laugh - all of this we have in common. The author is in love with his own preciousness and specialness, and unwilling to engage with his fellow because he thinks it will bring him down. He&#8217;s just a stuck-up ass, not an exemplar of some Deep and Meaningful Cultural Divide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMG</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424228</link>
		<dc:creator>AMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424228</guid>
		<description>Well said Mythago! I did find his tone insulting and condescending. I don't believe that we are meant to or able to connect with everyone deeply--however, as you said, he could have asked how the Sox are doing, and left it at that. (Unless he's one of those twits who lives in a city and don't recognize the logo of a national level sports team because 'I'm just not into sports...')

Antigone:
Maybe I'm reaching, but it sounds as if your family has a bit of insecurity about dealing with you, and now you're projecting this to onto others. If you like who you are, and where you are, and what you are working to become, this won't matter in the end. Yes they are family, but you might need to get your intellectual nourishment and true companionship from other people, who see the world your way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Mythago! I did find his tone insulting and condescending. I don&#8217;t believe that we are meant to or able to connect with everyone deeply&#8211;however, as you said, he could have asked how the Sox are doing, and left it at that. (Unless he&#8217;s one of those twits who lives in a city and don&#8217;t recognize the logo of a national level sports team because &#8216;I&#8217;m just not into sports&#8230;&#8217;)</p>
<p>Antigone:<br />
Maybe I&#8217;m reaching, but it sounds as if your family has a bit of insecurity about dealing with you, and now you&#8217;re projecting this to onto others. If you like who you are, and where you are, and what you are working to become, this won&#8217;t matter in the end. Yes they are family, but you might need to get your intellectual nourishment and true companionship from other people, who see the world your way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424172</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-424172</guid>
		<description>Deresiewicz is really making a backdoor insult at the plumber he talked to. Oh my, this simple tradesman is so far beneath me; how can I ever connect from my lofty perch? He sounds like an explorer who, on finding a new and isolated tribe of hunter-gatherers in the Amazon, rues that he was too busy taking macroeconomics to have bothered studying Primitive Languages 101.

Anyone with their head not firmly wedged up their ass is aware that you can generally get a conversation going by asking people about themselves. The guy's wearing a Red Sox cap, fercryingoutloud, think maybe you could ask him about how the Red Sox are doing this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deresiewicz is really making a backdoor insult at the plumber he talked to. Oh my, this simple tradesman is so far beneath me; how can I ever connect from my lofty perch? He sounds like an explorer who, on finding a new and isolated tribe of hunter-gatherers in the Amazon, rues that he was too busy taking macroeconomics to have bothered studying Primitive Languages 101.</p>
<p>Anyone with their head not firmly wedged up their ass is aware that you can generally get a conversation going by asking people about themselves. The guy&#8217;s wearing a Red Sox cap, fercryingoutloud, think maybe you could ask him about how the Red Sox are doing this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antigone</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-423654</link>
		<dc:creator>Antigone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/22/elitism-privilege-and-competition-some-thoughts-on-the-new-deresiewicz-article/#comment-423654</guid>
		<description>To Mark-

I do like to listen, actually: I find people endlessly fascinating.  But for whatever reason, people seem suspicious when I'm interested in them, and I ask them questions about themselves.

Or, with my family in particular, they seem to think even the questions are "hoitey-toitey".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mark-</p>
<p>I do like to listen, actually: I find people endlessly fascinating.  But for whatever reason, people seem suspicious when I&#8217;m interested in them, and I ask them questions about themselves.</p>
<p>Or, with my family in particular, they seem to think even the questions are &#8220;hoitey-toitey&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
