<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unattainable perfection versus the attainable good: of cruelty, veganism, and the lamentable Wesley J. Smith</title>
	<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-429242</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-429242</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And yes, I’m an abolitionist in my heart&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then we're back to the problem of the principle "don't use anything from animals" being placed above "make the choices that harm animals the least". When we're talking about commercial, large-scale production, the two may end up being pretty much the same for practical purposes, but they're not really the same.

And it's dishonest to say that you're 'not interested' in going after small herders or ranchers; you are, it's just that there are more important targets currently occupying your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And yes, I’m an abolitionist in my heart</p></blockquote>
<p>Then we&#8217;re back to the problem of the principle &#8220;don&#8217;t use anything from animals&#8221; being placed above &#8220;make the choices that harm animals the least&#8221;. When we&#8217;re talking about commercial, large-scale production, the two may end up being pretty much the same for practical purposes, but they&#8217;re not really the same.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s dishonest to say that you&#8217;re &#8216;not interested&#8217; in going after small herders or ranchers; you are, it&#8217;s just that there are more important targets currently occupying your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-428970</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-428970</guid>
		<description>No question, Mythago, I want change that benefits animals.  The purely vegan choice is, probably, the best one for the entire earth and all sentient creatures on its surface &lt;em&gt;in the longest of long runs&lt;/em&gt;.  Short term, going vegan is one of the best ways an average American can reduce his or her carbon footprint.  No question, I'm not interested in going after milk-drinking Hindus in a small Gujarati village, or after a small-scale family farmer with a flock of sheep in rural New Zealand.  Smithfield Foods; Tyson; Foster Farms; Hormel -- these are the companies we need to focus our energies on now.  And yes, I'm an abolitionist in my heart, but in the short-run, am willing to embrace the welfarist approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question, Mythago, I want change that benefits animals.  The purely vegan choice is, probably, the best one for the entire earth and all sentient creatures on its surface <em>in the longest of long runs</em>.  Short term, going vegan is one of the best ways an average American can reduce his or her carbon footprint.  No question, I&#8217;m not interested in going after milk-drinking Hindus in a small Gujarati village, or after a small-scale family farmer with a flock of sheep in rural New Zealand.  Smithfield Foods; Tyson; Foster Farms; Hormel &#8212; these are the companies we need to focus our energies on now.  And yes, I&#8217;m an abolitionist in my heart, but in the short-run, am willing to embrace the welfarist approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-428962</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-428962</guid>
		<description>Hugo, I'm completely in agreement with the position "I won't drink milk because the way it is produced in this country is cruel to the cows." But veganism, unless I'm badly mistaken, isn't about boycotting until conditions are better; it's about eschewing animal products, regardless of whether it results in suffering or death for the animal, purely &lt;I&gt;because&lt;/I&gt; they come from an animal.

And that's where it becomes problematic. If I can meet my caloric needs in part by getting milk and (non-rennet) cheese from goats I humanely raise myself, am I not a better friend to animals than the vegan who feeds himself with a bowl of rice that involved the killing of many bugs and mice to get that rice to table? Would you happily eat goat cheese at my house, knowing that the goats it came from led happy lives and that neither they nor their offspring would be culled or eaten? Or would you determine that something that came from an animal = bad, and therefore decline?

In other words, drawing a category of "nothing from animals" may make sense as a blunt, practical approach to choosing whether or not to eat commercially-grown food. It's not a good approach if what you're trying to decide is "what food choices can I make that are the least cruel?" 

It also doesn't really have the effect you're looking for, unless that effect is "shock the mundanes". You're hoping that people will give up milk. Maybe instead people will shrug and figure that it sucks, but they're not going vegan. Wouldn't you rather that people think about ways to get milk humanely, rather than see it as a choice between soy cheese and suffering cows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo, I&#8217;m completely in agreement with the position &#8220;I won&#8217;t drink milk because the way it is produced in this country is cruel to the cows.&#8221; But veganism, unless I&#8217;m badly mistaken, isn&#8217;t about boycotting until conditions are better; it&#8217;s about eschewing animal products, regardless of whether it results in suffering or death for the animal, purely <i>because</i> they come from an animal.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s where it becomes problematic. If I can meet my caloric needs in part by getting milk and (non-rennet) cheese from goats I humanely raise myself, am I not a better friend to animals than the vegan who feeds himself with a bowl of rice that involved the killing of many bugs and mice to get that rice to table? Would you happily eat goat cheese at my house, knowing that the goats it came from led happy lives and that neither they nor their offspring would be culled or eaten? Or would you determine that something that came from an animal = bad, and therefore decline?</p>
<p>In other words, drawing a category of &#8220;nothing from animals&#8221; may make sense as a blunt, practical approach to choosing whether or not to eat commercially-grown food. It&#8217;s not a good approach if what you&#8217;re trying to decide is &#8220;what food choices can I make that are the least cruel?&#8221; </p>
<p>It also doesn&#8217;t really have the effect you&#8217;re looking for, unless that effect is &#8220;shock the mundanes&#8221;. You&#8217;re hoping that people will give up milk. Maybe instead people will shrug and figure that it sucks, but they&#8217;re not going vegan. Wouldn&#8217;t you rather that people think about ways to get milk humanely, rather than see it as a choice between soy cheese and suffering cows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Spragge</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-428356</link>
		<dc:creator>John Spragge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-428356</guid>
		<description>Props to Mythago for nailing the problem with don't like/don't do, and double props for a very funny metaphor (self-righteousness giving a lap dance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Props to Mythago for nailing the problem with don&#8217;t like/don&#8217;t do, and double props for a very funny metaphor (self-righteousness giving a lap dance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427763</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427763</guid>
		<description>Mythago, I use the word "secretion" to drive home a point to people who drink milk to think about where it comes from. I find it sometimes makes people do a double-take, which is always a plus.

You CAN gather milk, honey, and wool without killing the animal -- but the mechanized abuse of dairy cows, bees, and sheep is appalling.  Animals that aren't slaughtered don't necessarily have good lives.  The "happy cows" ads on TV don't reflect the reality that most dairy cows never get to move around.  They're better off than their male offspring, who become veal.  It's pretty tough for your average American to avoid complicity with the abuses committed by the dairy industry.  If you've got your own cow whom you care for and milk, that's a big improvement -- but that's not how most Americans live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mythago, I use the word &#8220;secretion&#8221; to drive home a point to people who drink milk to think about where it comes from. I find it sometimes makes people do a double-take, which is always a plus.</p>
<p>You CAN gather milk, honey, and wool without killing the animal &#8212; but the mechanized abuse of dairy cows, bees, and sheep is appalling.  Animals that aren&#8217;t slaughtered don&#8217;t necessarily have good lives.  The &#8220;happy cows&#8221; ads on TV don&#8217;t reflect the reality that most dairy cows never get to move around.  They&#8217;re better off than their male offspring, who become veal.  It&#8217;s pretty tough for your average American to avoid complicity with the abuses committed by the dairy industry.  If you&#8217;ve got your own cow whom you care for and milk, that&#8217;s a big improvement &#8212; but that&#8217;s not how most Americans live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427708</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427708</guid>
		<description>"Opposed to X? Don't do X" is kind of a silly argument when X is something one considers to be a moral wrong that should be stopped. "Don't like honor killings? Then don't kill your daughter"--oh, okay, I guess that I shouldn't be bothered if people halfway around the world are murdering their children because somebody wolf-whistled at them. (And yes, it's equally stupid when the X is "abortion".) Similarly, it makes perfect sense to me that a vegan who believes meat is murder would want to end the killing of animals for food, rather than just saying, yo, I don't want to murder but it's OK with me if you do.

Hugo, you DO just realize you told a mother who has breast-fed three children that "milk is a secretion"? No, gosh, really? Thanks for the education! It's always good to have a man around to explain these things my lady-brain can't handle.

The point you're carefully not addressing, though, is that you can gather animal secretions or products (milk, honey, wool) without killing the animal, whereas there's really only one way to get a steak. So if I am drinking milk from a cow, that doesn't involve killing the cow - whereas your soy cheese may have required the deaths of many small animals.

(Again, I'm not arguing that therefore there's no point in trying to be cruelty-free; only that the holier-than-thou mindset is awfully seductive, and it seems to be giving you a lapdance, Hugo.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Opposed to X? Don&#8217;t do X&#8221; is kind of a silly argument when X is something one considers to be a moral wrong that should be stopped. &#8220;Don&#8217;t like honor killings? Then don&#8217;t kill your daughter&#8221;&#8211;oh, okay, I guess that I shouldn&#8217;t be bothered if people halfway around the world are murdering their children because somebody wolf-whistled at them. (And yes, it&#8217;s equally stupid when the X is &#8220;abortion&#8221;.) Similarly, it makes perfect sense to me that a vegan who believes meat is murder would want to end the killing of animals for food, rather than just saying, yo, I don&#8217;t want to murder but it&#8217;s OK with me if you do.</p>
<p>Hugo, you DO just realize you told a mother who has breast-fed three children that &#8220;milk is a secretion&#8221;? No, gosh, really? Thanks for the education! It&#8217;s always good to have a man around to explain these things my lady-brain can&#8217;t handle.</p>
<p>The point you&#8217;re carefully not addressing, though, is that you can gather animal secretions or products (milk, honey, wool) without killing the animal, whereas there&#8217;s really only one way to get a steak. So if I am drinking milk from a cow, that doesn&#8217;t involve killing the cow - whereas your soy cheese may have required the deaths of many small animals.</p>
<p>(Again, I&#8217;m not arguing that therefore there&#8217;s no point in trying to be cruelty-free; only that the holier-than-thou mindset is awfully seductive, and it seems to be giving you a lapdance, Hugo.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427563</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427563</guid>
		<description>People can and do change -- witness our painfully slow, but clearly evolving attitudes towards race, homosexuality, and so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can and do change &#8212; witness our painfully slow, but clearly evolving attitudes towards race, homosexuality, and so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427504</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427504</guid>
		<description>Hugo, I don't know if your last response was to me or not, or to other responders in general. I'm in basic agreement with you. We differ in the bright and shiny future part as I don't have confidence that human beings will change. Some people like eating meat and they also like to hunt, damage, destroy, slaughter and basically subject animals to all sorts of cruelty, simply because they can. A good many people are damaged and angry and desensitized to the suffering of animals, so they target them to inflict harm and cruelty on, simply because they can. That does not mean that people shouldn't try to educate the public or work towards promoting and advocating for more humane conditions for animals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo, I don&#8217;t know if your last response was to me or not, or to other responders in general. I&#8217;m in basic agreement with you. We differ in the bright and shiny future part as I don&#8217;t have confidence that human beings will change. Some people like eating meat and they also like to hunt, damage, destroy, slaughter and basically subject animals to all sorts of cruelty, simply because they can. A good many people are damaged and angry and desensitized to the suffering of animals, so they target them to inflict harm and cruelty on, simply because they can. That does not mean that people shouldn&#8217;t try to educate the public or work towards promoting and advocating for more humane conditions for animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427002</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-427002</guid>
		<description>Oh, let me be clear.  In some bright and shiny future, animals will be recognized as possessing actual rights, and slaughtering them for food will be unthinkable.  But that is a way off, and in the meantime, I want to work to help carnivores transition to, if nothing else, eating meat that lived and died under the best possible conditions.

And mythago, milk is a secretion -- when we call it "milk", we sometimes forget what it is and where it comes from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, let me be clear.  In some bright and shiny future, animals will be recognized as possessing actual rights, and slaughtering them for food will be unthinkable.  But that is a way off, and in the meantime, I want to work to help carnivores transition to, if nothing else, eating meat that lived and died under the best possible conditions.</p>
<p>And mythago, milk is a secretion &#8212; when we call it &#8220;milk&#8221;, we sometimes forget what it is and where it comes from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-426887</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/24/unattainable-perfection-versus-the-attainable-good-of-cruelty-veganism-and-the-lamentable-wesley-j-smith/#comment-426887</guid>
		<description>The game that Smith and the others play is a tiresome, but surprisingly effective one. “If you can’t be perfectly ‘cruelty-free’, why try?” If every choice you make results, in some sense, in harm, aren’t all harms equal?

I agree that the game is tiresome and much like a broken record. I suppose it's a way to discredit veganism and to silence advocates of more humane methods of slaughtering animals in the meat industry. It sure doesn't sound like problem-solving. 

When I learned, as a child, where meat came from, I had a strong negative reaction and didn't want to eat it. My mother basically coerced me to eat meat, because she thought she was doing something healthy and nutritional for her daughter. I'm certain they were amused by my reaction, as other people often are and for whatever reason feel the need to blirt and spew criticisms, or commentaries laced with sarcasm, etc. It's too bad more people don't focus on problem-solving and try to adopt a more open attitude towards someone with a differing viewpoint. As an adult I still prefer a plant-based diet, and at times have tried to eliminate meat entirely from my diet for reasons mentioned above (healthier, least cruel and more sustainable). I'm not a perfect eater and although, I've never been much of a meat eater, I do occasionally eat it for protein. I feel a lot better about that choice and think it a healthier one for me. I know meat eaters and don't push my views on them. Unfortunately I cannot say the same for them as they come across as angry, caustic, sarcastic and defensive, if I even mention that I prefer a plant-based diet. I've also stopped inviting people over for dinner since so many people are more interested in their political agenda's and need to be heard and that they forgotten how to act like a decent guest, let alone humanbeing or even someone that anyone would want to converse with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game that Smith and the others play is a tiresome, but surprisingly effective one. “If you can’t be perfectly ‘cruelty-free’, why try?” If every choice you make results, in some sense, in harm, aren’t all harms equal?</p>
<p>I agree that the game is tiresome and much like a broken record. I suppose it&#8217;s a way to discredit veganism and to silence advocates of more humane methods of slaughtering animals in the meat industry. It sure doesn&#8217;t sound like problem-solving. </p>
<p>When I learned, as a child, where meat came from, I had a strong negative reaction and didn&#8217;t want to eat it. My mother basically coerced me to eat meat, because she thought she was doing something healthy and nutritional for her daughter. I&#8217;m certain they were amused by my reaction, as other people often are and for whatever reason feel the need to blirt and spew criticisms, or commentaries laced with sarcasm, etc. It&#8217;s too bad more people don&#8217;t focus on problem-solving and try to adopt a more open attitude towards someone with a differing viewpoint. As an adult I still prefer a plant-based diet, and at times have tried to eliminate meat entirely from my diet for reasons mentioned above (healthier, least cruel and more sustainable). I&#8217;m not a perfect eater and although, I&#8217;ve never been much of a meat eater, I do occasionally eat it for protein. I feel a lot better about that choice and think it a healthier one for me. I know meat eaters and don&#8217;t push my views on them. Unfortunately I cannot say the same for them as they come across as angry, caustic, sarcastic and defensive, if I even mention that I prefer a plant-based diet. I&#8217;ve also stopped inviting people over for dinner since so many people are more interested in their political agenda&#8217;s and need to be heard and that they forgotten how to act like a decent guest, let alone humanbeing or even someone that anyone would want to converse with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
